Skip to main content

Google combats manipulation of Play Store app rankings with improved system

Google play
Ymgerman/123RF
For small-time and unproven app developers, app store visibility can make or break a new debut. Considering how much time, money, and effort is riding on an app’s performance in the Google Play Store on Android, it’s not exactly surprising that app rankings manipulation is a burgeoning cottage industry.

Companies like BuyAppStoreReviews, AppRebates, BestReviewApp, and others claim to offer five-star ratings or a week in the App Store’s Top 10, and they make a pretty penny doing so: some charge as many as $65,000 per week on average, according to Cult of Mac.

It’s an unscrupulous practice that has been the subject of Google’s enforcement efforts in the past, but now, the search giant is rolling out significant improvements to its detection mechanisms. On Monday, Google announced a new Play Store system that willl punish developers caught manipulating placement with fraudulent installs, fake reviews, and incentivized ratings.

The new system, which Google said is significantly more accurate than its predecessor, is also a lot more automated: it will automatically filter from view apps that have moved up the charts using fraudulent services. And it’s more proactive, too. Developers who are found to be repeatedly violating the Play Stores policies on rankings are subject to having their entire portfolio of apps removed.

It’s a hardline approach, Google said, but one motivated by a worthy mission: protecting the integrity of the wider Play Store community. Apps that top the charts with illicit services and tools harm apps that would otherwise rank higher, which by extension harms the consumers perusing them. Unwitting Play Store users are pointed in the direction of apps undeserving of a download, Google said.

“These attempts [to manipulate rankings] harm our community of developers by hindering their chances of being discovered or recommended through our systems,” Google’s Kazushi Nagayama and Andrew Ahn said in a blog post. “Ultimately, they put the end user at risk of making wrong decisions based on inaccurate, unauthentic information.”

The company suggested that developers employing the services of third-party marketing agencies ensure that their promotion is based on “legitimate practices” as defined by Google’s Developer Support Resources.

Manipulated app rankings aren’t just Google’s problem. Apple has struggled to maintain fairness in the App Store, which takes accumulated downloads, overall ratings, and page traffic into account in determining which apps feature in its Top Charts section. (The Play Store, by contrast, highlights personalized recommendations based on apps that users have installed in the past.)

A viral image last year depicted Apple’s dilemma: Chinese workers manually installing, rating, reviewing, and uninstalling apps in front of hundreds of iPhones. In 2012, Apple announced a widespread crackdown on developers using deceptive marketing tactics to promote their apps on the App Store. And according to TechCrunch, Apple regularly takes action to remove ratings associated with “fraud or manipulation.”

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
App subscription fatigue is quickly ruining my smartphone
App Store displayed on an iPhone 14 Pro against a pink background

When I first got an iPhone in 2008, I remember checking out web apps, which were basically websites that I would keep bookmarked on the home screen. Every time I opened them up, they somehow didn’t look like I just launched mobile Safari. Eventually, Apple launched the App Store in July 2008, mostly eliminating the need for antiquated web apps.

Since the App Store opened up, we've gotten to see innovative new apps and games that took our iPhones to a completely new level — showing us what our devices were capable of. I was excited to see and hear about new apps for a variety of things, from task managers to camera replacement apps to photo editors to journals and so much more. Games were also making use of the iPhone’s accelerometer and gyroscope sensors, so it wasn’t just always about touchscreen controls.

Read more
This EU law could force Apple to open up iMessage and the App Store
Someone holding an iPhone 14 with the display turned on.

The EU's Digital Markets Act (or DMA) has gone into force today. It could force Apple to open up the iPhone's iMessage and app-buying platforms to third-party apps and services. Companies that fall afoul of the act could be fined up to 20% of global turnover. Apple has previously criticized the DMA for being a "blunt instrument."

The DMA aims to allow smaller services to compete more equitably with larger ones. This means that companies with a certain number of users, labeled as gatekeepers, would have to make their platforms interoperable with smaller ones. Large platforms like Facebook or iMessage, for example, would be required to open up, while something like Signal could scrape by.

Read more
Google’s Android monopoly finds its biggest challenge, and Apple might be next
Apps screen on the Google Pixel 7.

The Competition Commission of India slapped Google with two hefty fines over anti-competitive strategies that have allowed it to dominate the mobile ecosystem in India. Totaling over $250 million, the penalties reprimand Google for forcing smartphone makers to avoid Android forks, prefer Google’s web search service, and pre-install popular cash cows like YouTube on phones.

Google was also disciplined for forcing its own billing system on developers that allowed the giant to take up to a 30% share of all in-app purchases for applications listed on the app store. Google is not really a stranger to titanic penalties; The EU handed Google a record-breaking fine of approximately $5 billion in 2018 for abusing its dominant market position — a penalty that was upheld in September this year following Google’s appeal.

Read more