Skip to main content

Lives depend on how fast drivers resume control of semi-autonomous vehicles

BMW self-driving car test
Image used with permission by copyright holder
How fast can you react? When cars don’t have steering wheels and humans have no means of vehicle control, “takeover time” won’t be a thing. With driver-assist features and semi-autonomous driving modes increasing every model year, however, the speed with which human drivers respond to alerts to resume manual control is a big-time concern.

Researchers at the University of Southhampton ran simulation tests to measure human “takeover time” under two conditions. They measured how long it took drivers riding in the car but not otherwise engaged to take back control and the length of time when drivers were distracted by another activity — in the test simulation they were told to imagine they were reading an issue of National Geographic.

In the simulation test, subjects drove a Jaguar XJ 350 traveling at 70 mph for 18.6 miles in moderate traffic on a six-lane highway, with three lanes traveling in each direction with a separation barrier. The test group consisted of 26 participants (10 females and 16 males) ages 20 to 52 with a minimum of one-year and average of 10.6 years of driving experience. Switching between manual and automated mode required touching two buttons on a tablet located on the simulation vehicle center console. When the test required human takeover from the automated mode, an icon replaced the speed indicator on the instrument panel and a computer-generated voice stated, “Please resume control.”

In the first test mode, with drivers not distracted, the median takeover time was 4.56 seconds. The range of responses, however, was from 1.97 seconds to 25.75 seconds. So that means that for the subject with the slowest tested takeover time, the car going 70 mph would have traveled just over a half mile before the human regained control. At the median time of 4.56 seconds, the car would have traveled 468 feet, or a little more than one and a half football fields.

In the distracted mode, testing the range in response time wasn’t as great, from 3.17 to 20.99 seconds, with a median time of 6.06 seconds. So in the median takeover time, the car would have gone 622 feet, or more than two football fields, before human takeover. In the slowest response time, the car traveled about 2,155 feet.

It’s important to note that the test times didn’t measure driver response to whatever was going on, but just how long it took them to regain control. Then they had to assess the situation and take appropriate action. If you don’t find that a little scary, maybe think again.

The authors of the study note that while contemporary driver assistance features are commonly considered “automated,” they are more accurately “conditionally automated” and drivers should be fully aware of the misconception and know the difference. Once vehicles are fully autonomous, all passengers will just be able to ride, but until that time, driver takeover time will be a crucial factor.

Editors' Recommendations

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Commerce teams. Bruce uses smart devices…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more