Skip to main content

JVC and Kenwood launch head units with wireless Android Auto

Own a Pixel or Nexus phone? You can now use Android Auto wirelessly

best Android Auto apps Android Auto app
Image used with permission by copyright holder
A wireless version of Android Auto has been teased for some time, going back to when Google first discussed the idea in 2016. But for some time, the platform didn’t take many strides to free itself from cords. Finally, after teasing “wireless connectivity for Android Auto” at the end of 2017, JVC unveiled multiple head units with the feature at CES 2018. And now, three months later, Google is helping out as well, by enabling wireless Android Auto for folks this week.

If you’re the owner of a Pixel, Pixel XL, Pixel 2, Pixel 2 XL, Nexus 5X, or Nexus 6P running Android Oreo or higher, you’ll be able to automatically load Android Auto onto your car display as soon as you climb into your Android Auto-equipped car. No longer will you need to plug in your phone — it’ll connect automatically via Wi-Fi. More devices are expected to roll out throughout the year with this same capability.

As it stands, this support only works for devices in North America, and the only head units that work are from JVC and Kenwood. Back in January, JVC unveiled two head units — the DVD-equipped KW-V940BW and disc-less KW-M845BW — under its main JVC brand, plus a trio of more expensive units under the Kenwood brand. The receivers also support AppleCarPlay, JVC’s WebLink (for apps like Waze, YouTube, and Yelp), and can interface directly with Spotify, iHeartRadio, and Pandora. They can also stream music from up to five phones.

Both JVC models have 6.8-inch resistive touchscreens, four 5o-watt outputs (or three 4-volt pre-amp outputs) and one backup camera input. The DVD-equipped KW-V940BW is priced at $700, roughly matching Alpine’s AppleCarPlay wireless receiver. Ditching the DVD player drops the price to $600 for the KW-M845BW model.

The three Kenwood models cost more, but also include more features. Each has an easier-to-use capacitive touchscreen, two camera inputs, and a proprietary dash-cam connection, among other features. The DMX905S, which features a 6.95-inch standard-definition screen, is the cheapest of the three at $805. The DDX9905 gets DVD playback and a 6.8-inch HD screen for $1,100. The top-of-the-line DNX995S adds Garmin navigation to the DDX9905’s features, and is priced at $1,500.

For many users, simply plugging in your Android phone will be a more cost-efficient option than going wireless (unless you own one of the aforementioned newly supported smartphones). For those with the money to spare, JVC’s wireless receiver could free them from the tyranny of cords and dongles — instantly making it one of the best car stereos around. Beyond that, there’s no reason to think that this technology will remain unaffordable for too long. As more companies enter the market, we’ll doubtless see prices drop as the tech becomes easier to produce.

Even with wires, Android Auto remains a great service for those cars that support it. Those driving an unsupported model aren’t left out in the cold either as some manufacturers are selling wired receivers for about $400.

These devices will allow users to make phone calls, compose text messages, find directions, and more, all without ever having to take their hands off the wheel. It’s not quite self-driving cars, but it is still a great way to use technology to make driving safer and easier for everyone.

And in case you were confused, JVC and Kenwood have been an item since 2007, when the Victor Company of Japan Kenwood agreed to put a ring on it. The two companies officially changed their name to JVCKenwood Corp. in 2011 — so much for maiden names.

Updated: Pixel and Nexus smartphones are now compatible with Android Auto wirelessly. 

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Want to join the Android Army? Here are all the cars with Android Auto
cars with Android Auto

Having a feature packed infotainment system built into your car can be a great asset, as long as you have the ability to figure it out. Android Auto manages to be useful, filled with useful features, such as Google Maps and more, yet it’s uncomplicated and straightforward. Its smartphone-like screen is intuitive and easy to learn.

Most carmakers sell at least one model compatible with Android Auto, and more manufacturers are adding the system all the time. If you’re looking for a vehicle that already features Android Auto, or want to see if your current car is compatible with it, take a look at this list. If you add this feature, it may be seen as a specific trim which could tack on an extra charge.

Read more
How to set up Android Auto; driving with Google as your copilot
cars with Android Auto

With Android Auto, you can keep your focus on the road while still accessing maps, music, podcasts, messages, phone calls, and more from your Android smartphone. Designed to work with Android Marshmallow 6.0 and up, your favorite apps can appear on your dashboard while driving, providing you with a more connected digital experience.

With Google Assistant built-in, you can issue voice commands hands-free to remain safe on the road. If you have an Android device and want to get started, follow our guide on how to set up Android Auto.

Read more
Apple CarPlay vs. Android Auto
Android Auto in a car.

Apple and Google don't need to build cars -- there are enough local and foreign manufacturers that fill that role well. Instead, these two tech giants are excellent at building ecosystems and designing hardware that fits in your hand. The merging of the two -- your smartphone and your car -- was only inevitable.

Enter Android Auto and CarPlay. These two platforms aim to bring your touchy media, messages, and navigation to tablet-sized screens installed in the latest cars. Both mostly achieve the same purpose in their own unique way. But what makes them different? What makes them similar? Even more, which one is better?

Read more