Skip to main content

They were robbed! From Crowe to Pacino, 10 times Oscar voters got it wrong

Life has its share of sure things. Death, taxes — you know the drill. Up until a few years ago, the Chicago Cubs went more than 100 years without a World Series title. But few things in this world are as reliable as Academy Awards voters getting it wrong. Every year, stories announcing Oscar nominees are accompanied by opinion pieces complaining about who got snubbed, followed roughly a month later by rants over upsets at the actual ceremony.

With the 93rd Oscars rapidly approaching on Sunday, April 25th, now is a fine time to look back at several performances that were nominated and astoundingly denied the little naked golden man by the ever-surprisingly out-of-touch Oscar voters.

Ralph Fiennes

Schindler’s List (1993)

Universal Pictures

Tommy Lee Jones is a tremendous actor and The Fugitive is a highly entertaining film, but how he edged out Fiennes for the Best Supporting Actor Oscar still perplexes a quarter-century later. Failing to recognize Fiennes’ chilling portrayal of a monstrous Nazi officer in Schindler’s List, which deservedly took home the Best Picture prize, illustrates, among other follies, a pattern of Oscar voters rewarding veteran actors for lesser performances.

That was far from the only mistake voters made in this category. They completely ignored Sean Penn’s utterly transformative turn as a sleazy defense lawyer in Carlito’s Way, as well as Val Kilmer, who did his career-best work as Doc Holliday in Tombstone (a performance that launched a thousand memes). While neither actor was nominated that year, Penn got his revenge years later, taking home trophies for Mystic River in 2003 and Milk in 2008.

Russell Crowe

A Beautiful Mind (2001)

Imagine Entertainment

While Denzel Washington took home his second Oscar for going against type as a really bad cop in Training Day, the Best Actor award actually should have gone to the previous year’s winner, Russell Crowe, for A Beautiful Mind. That film stole the Best Picture Oscar from The Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring, but Crowe’s performance as a real-life schizophrenic genius is one for the ages.

Voters also completely ignored one of Gene Hackman’s best performances that year. Hackman already had two Oscars on his mantel when he made The Royal Tenenbaums, but that doesn’t explain why Academy voters whiffed so badly, not even granting him a nomination. The nomination Hackman should have snagged that year went to Penn instead for his less-than-stellar work as a developmentally disabled man in the deservedly forgotten I Am Sam.

Madeline Kahn

Blazing Saddles (1974)

Warner Bros.

Given the Academy’s historical reluctance to honor comedic performances, the fact that Kahn was even nominated for Best Supporting Actress for her send-up of a Marlene Dietrich-inspired saloon singer in Mel Brooks’ side-splitting Western spoof could be deemed a victory in and of itself. But that ignores the sheer brilliance of Kahn’s interpretation of Brooks’ inspired lunacy.

From her show-stopping rendition of the double entendre-filled “I’m Tired” to her inability to pronounce the “R” sound (It’s twue! It’s twue!), Kahn steals every moment she’s on screen. Ingrid Bergman ended up winning her third Oscar for a pedestrian performance in Murder on the Orient Express that didn’t even merit a nomination, making this one of the Academy’s more grievous oversights.

Al Pacino

The Godfather (1972)

Paramount Pictures

This one is a comedy of errors. First off, Pacino was nominated for Best Supporting Actor despite having the lion’s share of the screen time in Coppola’s mobster classic. Ironically, the Best Actor Oscar would go to co-star Marlon Brando, who appeared on screen for less than a third of the movie. Pacino went up against two more of his co-stars, James Caan and Robert Duvall. All were relative newcomers, but the Oscar went to Joel Grey for Cabaret. Should Pacino have edged out Brando for Best Actor? Absolutely. While Brando had the flashier role, Pacino brilliantly depicts the transformation of Michael Corleone from war hero to criminal kingpin.

Al Pacino

The Godfather Part II (1974)

Paramount Pictures

Two years later, the Academy honored sentimental favorite Art Carney for the long-since-forgotten Harry and Tonto, ignoring not just Pacino in The Godfather Part II — perhaps the greatest sequel of all time — but also Jack Nicholson in Chinatown and Dustin Hoffman in Lenny. Pacino should have won Best Actor for both Godfather films.

Clint Eastwood

Unforgiven (1992)

Warner Bros.

Speaking of Pacino, Oscar voters arguably made up for past sins against the actor by rewarding him with a Best Actor Oscar for chewing scenery and shouting a lot as a blind retired Army officer in Scent of a Woman. While Denzel Washington’s performance in the title role in Malcolm X was also worthy, this one should have gone to Eastwood, who did take home his first of two directing trophies for helming this revisionist Western.

True to the many cowboy characters he played in his career, Eastwood’s William Munny utters few words. But the actor expresses volumes with his lined face and stoic demeanor as the onetime indiscriminate killer who’s pulled back into the outlaw life by the need to care for his motherless children.

Eddie Murphy

Dreamgirls (2006)

DreamWorks Pictures

Full disclosure: I love me some Alan Arkin. I am currently enjoying his hilarious deadpanning on Netflix’s The Kominsky Method, with Michael Douglas. But there’s simply no way he should have beaten out Murphy for Best Supporting Actor in 2006. Murphy was the frontrunner for this award thanks to his electric (and tragic) performance as a heroin-addicted, James Brown-like singer. Murphy has long been famous for incorporating his musical talents into his stand-up, and he takes it to another level here, while also showcasing some unexpectedly raw dramatic chops.

There’s long been talk that Murphy’s follow-up, the abysmal Norbit, which was released during awards season, cost him the Oscar. If it’s true that some Academy voters penalized Murphy for making a terrible film, they should have their voting rights stripped.

Burt Reynolds

Boogie Nights (1997)

New Line Cinema

This is a tough one. Like Murphy in Dreamgirls, fellow funnyman Robin Williams gave one helluva dramatic turn in Good Will Hunting, landing him his one and only Oscar. While the late Williams certainly earned his Best Supporting Actor win, Reynolds, who died last year, gave the better performance. Reynolds reportedly wasn’t a fan of his own performance or Paul Thomas Anderson’s directing style, but he was never better than in this film about the porn industry in the 1970s and ’80s.

During that actual time period, Reynolds coasted on his considerable charm in a lot of bad but successful (and not-so-successful) comedy and action films ( the Cannonball Run movies, Paternity, Stick), but despite the animosity between them, Anderson was able to tap into a side of the actor no one else seemed to know was there. As the almost fatherly porn producer Jack Horner, Reynolds made this flesh peddler a flesh-and-blood human being.

Sylvester Stallone

Creed (2015)

Warner Bros.

Like Murphy, Stallone seemed destined to get his due as an actor late in his career for playing former boxer Rocky Balboa for the seventh time. In previous films, Rocky went from being the lovable, pudgy, and punch-drunk underdog to the ridiculously muscular and successful heavyweight champion.

Creed revisits the character in his twilight years, after he’s lost everybody he loves and has finally been beaten down by the punches life has thrown at him. Stallone takes the character from that low point to a place where he learns to live again by training the illegitimate son of his greatest foe (and friend), Apollo Creed. It’s pretty fancy footwork from an actor who has taken a lot of jabs from critics over the decades. The Best Supporting Actor Oscar ended up going to Mark Rylance for Bridge of Spies. As they say in the fight game: “He was robbed!”

Peter O’Toole

The Lion in Winter (1968)

AVCO Embassy Pictures

All that brings us to Oscar’s biggest bridesmaid, an actor who was nominated eight times and never won. Film geeks might ask, “How did he not win for Lawrence of Arabia?” That’s easy, he was up against an equally classic performance by Gregory Peck, who made noble lawyer and father Atticus Finch one of cinema’s most beloved characters in To Kill a Mockingbird.

One could argue that O’Toole should have won for playing King Henry II in 1964’s Becket, when he faced off against co-star and friend Richard Burton (himself a seven-time nominee with no wins). But Rex Harrison deservedly took home the trophy for his career-defining turn as Professor Henry Higgins in My Fair Lady, a role that landed him a Tony Award on Broadway.

So, which performance should O’Toole have won for? His second go-round as Henry II in The Lion in Winter. Cliff Robertson took home the Best Actor Oscar for playing a mentally disabled man in Charly (Oscar voters do love to honor actors playing the afflicted), but that film has long since slipped into obscurity, while The Lion in Winter stands as a master class in acting. O’Toole’s co-star, Katherine Hepburn, took home the Best Actress Oscar for playing Eleanor of Aquitaine.

One final Oscar crime: The Lion in Winter was also robbed of a Best Picture win by the so-so film adaptation of the musical Oliver!

Editors' Recommendations

Rob Oster
Copy Chief
Rob joined Digital Trends in April 2016 after more than 20 years as a reporter and copy editor at twice-weekly and daily…
You have until June 9 to save $500 off an 85-inch Samsung The Frame TV
A painting being displayed on a Samsung The Frame QLED.

Looking for great TV deals? You still have time to save $500 on the Samsung 85-inch The Frame QLED TV when you head over to Samsung. It usually costs $4,300, but right now the popular and stylish TV is down to $3,800, making it more affordable than before. If you’re keen to invest in a large TV but love to save money too, this is a good opportunity. Here’s what you need to know about the TV before you decide to buy.

Why you should buy the Samsung 85-inch The Frame QLED TV
One of the best QLED TVs around, the Samsung 85-inch The Frame QLED TV is a delight in so many ways. At its core, it’s a fantastic QLED TV with 100% Color Volume with Quantum Dot technology saturating the screen with a billion colors. QLED adds a layer of quantum dots to a TV’s LED backlight with these dots, once exposed to light, emitting their own light with a high level of efficiency to provide great picture quality.

Read more
It’s your last chance to get up to $1,900 off a Samsung OLED TV
The Samsung S90C in a living room environment.

There’s still a little time left to snap up one of the best TV deals available today, with Samsung still selling the 83-inch S90C OLED TV for $3,500 instead of $5,400. The $1,900 discount is a pretty vast one and one that you certainly don’t want to skip. If you’re looking for a great new TV for your large living space, you’re going to love this deal. Let’s take a look at how great the Samsung S90C OLED TV is.

Why you should buy the Samsung 83-inch S90C OLED TV
Samsung makes some of the best TVs around and we’re huge fans of the Samsung 83-inch S90C OLED TV. It has an OLED panel so you get self-lit pixels which can light up independently of each other. That means that you can enjoy the deepest blacks and the brightest colors all on the same scene, ensuring you never miss a detail. The Samsung 83-inch S90C OLED TV uses a Neural Quantum Processor with 4K upscaling so its AI-powered processor can transform whatever you’re watching. There’s also HDR OLED which uses AI deep learning to analyze each scene, detecting areas that need to brighter, darker, or simply richer in color.

Read more
This Sonos Bluetooth speaker has a discount in time for beach weather
Sonos Roam SL in black on a rainy rock outdoors.

A day out at the beach. Cooking outside using a discounted grill or smoker. Pool party madness. What do they all three have in common? A lot of fun, but also a great chance to get any sound equipment ruined by a sudden downpour or a splash of inevitable water. That's why there are models of waterproof Bluetooth speakers, of which the Sonos Roam SL is one. And the good news is that you can get yours at a discounted rate before summer officially gets here. Right now, the Sonos Roam SL is just $127, which is $33 down from its typical price of $160. To get yours, all you need to do is tap the button below. Consider also reading below, as we examine the speaker and see why it is considered an easy pick up.

Why you should buy the Sonos Roam SL
The Sonos Roam SL is an easy-to-use, compact speaker for wherever you roam. Connect to it easily over Wi-Fi at home or Bluetooth on the go, giving you easy options to control the sound in a way that makes sense for you and your location. If you're at home and connected to your Wi-Fi system and have other Sonos speakers, you can even get the Sonos multi-room experience, which syncs everything in a nice way. So, you can keep the Sonos Roam SL out on the patio (where it might get rained upon) and keep the best Sonos speakers indoors and have a really cool, worry-free party experience that not many others will be able to replicate.

Read more