Skip to main content

You paid too much money for your Pixel Watch — and Google knows it

A new report has revealed the profit margins for the Google Pixel Watch, and it looks like Google is taking home a lot more than its competitors.

According to a report from Counterpoint Research, it costs Google $123 to build a single Pixel Watch (specifically, the 4G LTE variant), which Google charges $400 for. When compared to the profit margins for similar devices, it feels like Google has some explaining to do.

Google Pixel Watch on a wrist.
Andrew Martonik / Digital Trends

Obviously, a company like Google has to make money, but a 69% profit margin feels a little steep. Apple, which is famously known for having the highest profit margins in the mobile industry, had profit margins of 66% for the Apple Watch Series 6, which initially retailed for $400. While that’s only 3% less than Google’s margin, Apple Watches are able to justify their price better thanks to the “high integration of in-house hardware and software,” as Counterpoint points out.

Recommended Videos

The current crop of flagship Apple Watches, however, are hardly comparable devices to the Pixel Watch. In terms of features and quality, it’s more accurate to compare the Pixel Watch to something like the Apple Watch SE 2, which retails for $250, or the Galaxy Watch 5, which retails for $280. When looking at it from that perspective, Google is paying less than its competitors to make its smartwatches, but charging more than 30% more for them.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

At the end of the day, there’s not much to be done to make Google lower its prices. However, it can help prospective Pixel Watch buyers be a little more informed about what exactly they’re buying. As mentioned above, high profit margins are an industry standard, especially when it comes to Apple devices, but the level of quality just isn’t quite there yet for the Pixel Watch.

It’s also worth pointing out that nothing here is meant to dissuade anyone from buying a Pixel Watch if they feel that it’s the right device for their life. It’s just always a good thing when consumers are making more informed purchases.

Peter Hunt Szpytek
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A podcast host and journalist, Peter covers mobile news with Digital Trends and gaming news, reviews, and guides for sites…
5 phones you should buy instead of the iPhone 16
Someone holding the iPhone 16.

Apple’s iPhone 16 has arrived, and it’s quite an impressive offering this year. Not only does it come in some of the best colors we’ve seen in a while, but it closes the gap between the base and Pro models even more.

That's all to say the iPhone 16 is a fantastic phone, but if you’re thinking about buying it as your next smartphone purchase, you should also consider some of these alternatives.
iPhone 16 Plus

Read more
5 phones you should buy instead of the Google Pixel 9 Pro
Pixel 9 Pro in Rose Quartz.

It’s been quite an exciting year for smartphones, especially with the arrival of the Google Pixel 9 series. Google gave its flagship phone a refreshing new design, more power and performance, and fun new colors.

If you’re considering the Pixel 9 Pro this year, that’s a great choice! We love the Pixel 9 Pro. But there are also other options to consider at a similar price point or even less. Before you buy the Pixel 9 Pro, here are five other phones you may want to get instead.
Google Pixel 9

Read more
I did an iPhone 16 Pro and Pixel 9 Pro camera test. It’s not even close
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max in Desert Titanium (left) and a Rose Quartz Google Pixel 9 Pro.

We’re at the tail end of the year, which means that pretty much all the flagship smartphones have now been released. This includes Google’s Pixel 9 Pro and Apple’s iPhone 16 Pro.

Both of these Pro flagships have beautiful designs, powerful processors, and great triple-lens camera systems. But which one takes better photos? Let’s find out.
iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro: camera specs

Read more