Skip to main content

Facebook plays favorites, blocks Instagram-like app Vintage Camera

vintage cam blockedIs Facebook pulling a Twitter? The social network is sitting pretty when it comes to photo-sharing thanks to its acquisition of Instagram, as the app just reached the 100 million user milestone, but there are reports surfacing that Facebook is starting to block Instagram competitors. Specifically, French app developer Presselite recently discovered that its popular photo app, Vintage Camera, has been blocked by Facebook. So what gives?

New apps need access to users’ outside social profiles if they want to hit widespread success; the ability to have content made with its app shared on Twitter, Facebook, and elsewhere is crucial to growth. So with Facebook deciding to block all photo uploads from Vintage Camera to its user’s Facebook pages, you can see why Presselite was outraged. And so were its users, as the BBC originally reported.

Vintage Camera definitely has hints of being Instagram-like, but tries to put its own stamp on the genre (really, that’s tough for any filter app out there now that Instagram has sufficiently dominated the space). But at the end of the day, Vintage Camera is a photo app that uses filters – just like Facebook’s billion dollar baby, Instagram. Vintage Camera’s user numbers, which sit at a respectable 8 million, might also make Facebook uncomfortable. It’s no 100 million, but it’s a relatively young app and could be enough to make Facebook nervous.

fb vintage camera pagePresselite attempted to appeal Facebook’s sudden decision, but was met by a brick wall. While the French company claims that Facebook is silently killing off its competition and burying any traces of them, at least on Facebook, the social network says otherwise.

Apparently Vintage Camera was receiving “strong negative feedback,” which merited shutting off the app’s pipeline to Facebook. Presselite’s co-founder Antoine Morcos says that isn’t the case, telling us the app has received minimal negative reviews. More specifically, users were uploading between 1,000 and 3,000 photos, and only 0.03 of users had anything negative to say, according to AppAdvice. On the app’s page in the Facebook App center, it has a rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars. 

Of course, Facebook fired back, saying: 

“Pending on the violation, we give developers an opportunity to come into compliance via a warning system. In the case of this application, the application was not in compliance with our platform policies and had received three warnings prior to our systems taking action on the application.”

According to Presselite, this was the answer received after questioning why Vintage Camera was blocked: 

“We’ve checked out the circumstances of your app’s restriction, and we found that your app received strong negative feedback from users and their friends. Unfortunately, we will not be able to restore your app’s functionality.”

But the Vintage Camera developers aren’t backing down. “So Facebook seems to consider that 0.3 percent negative feedback is ‘strong’?” Morcos tell us. “Currently, Facebook does not provide any acceptable level of negative feedback, so Facebook is free to decide for each case.” 

“They do not give any details on why Vintage Camera has been restricted, and which part of Facebook policies our app is in violation. Facebook has not been able to provide us the clear reason of this restriction,” Morcos says. “Also, we want to understand how Facebook could restrict our application with only 0.3 percent negative feedback. Vintage Camera is not violating any of Facebook Platform Principles.”

Morcos also shared these revealing images with us, showing that the app was, by all accounts, providing a positive user experience. 

vintage cam negative feedback
Image used with permission by copyright holder
vintagecamera sharing per day
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Vintage Camera has enough similarities to Instagram that it wouldn’t be entirely surprising if Facebook were underhandedly compromising Vintage Camera’s growth by closing off its access. Facebook did block Vine (owned by Twitter) from using Facebook’s “find people” feature, and blocked Yandex’s Wonder app, just as Facebook launched the competing Graph Search. It’s another unfortunate incidence in a trend where social networks are making it hard and harder to socially share content. Image that. 

Topics
Francis Bea
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Francis got his first taste of the tech industry in a failed attempt at a startup during his time as a student at the…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more