Skip to main content

Apple vs. Samsung: Judge puts hold on $450 million of $1 billion award

Apple-vs-Samsung5Last summer, everyone in the tech world watched excitedly to find out just how the Apple vs. Samsung lawsuit would play out. For those who were asleep, Apple sued Samsung for $2.5 billion dollars for a slew of what were, at the time, alleged patent infringements.

As we reported at the trial’s conclusion, the court ultimately ruled largely in favor of Apple. And while the Cupertino conglomerate didn’t get the full amount they were hoping for — in fact, it got less than half — it still dealt a major blow to Samsung (though not nearly enough to put the company into financial distress), awarding it $1,049,343,540.

However, as reported by Foss Patents, five months later, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge that resided over the trial, ordered a strike against nearly half of the damages: specifically $450,514,650. This doesn’t necessarily mean Apple won’t get the money, eventually. This is in response to Samsung’s lawyers questioning the fairness in which the jury awarded damages to 14 individual Samsung devices: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S2 AT&T, Galaxy Tab, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Nexus S 4G, Replenish, and Transform

So now, Apple and Samsung are headed back to the courthouse, though there’s no word yet as to when this trial will take place. But we do know that an entirely new jury is going to be summoned, so this could be another lengthy trial, as the lawyers on both sides will have to reintroduce most of the evidence again in order to educate them.

But there’s more money still to potentially be awarded to Apple aside from the damages from the device infringements. Before the first trial, Apple requested, and was ultimately awarded the right to, supplemental damages for all sales that took place during the course of the trial.

In addition, Apple also requested, and was granted, interest on these sales through to the time a verdict was finally reached. While Apple requested the prime interest rate, Samsung countered, asking for the 52-week Treasury bill rate, which is significantly lower — today it’s at just 0.15 percent. This was one part of the trial in which Samsung “won.”

Of course, neither of these could happen until the trial ended and the court could review official sales numbers throughout the time the verdict was reached. But now that’s being pushed back again, until trial number two ends, so this will still have to wait. (It’s unclear whether or not the court will consider sales from the time between the original verdict and the follow-up; likely, it will have to be at Apple’s request.)

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. We’ll be watching the story closely and will keep you all posted.

Joshua Pramis
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Spending a childhood engrossed in such technologically inspiring television shows like Voltron, Small Wonder, and Power…
Samsung Galaxy A54 vs. Galaxy S23: should you spend $450 or $800?
The back of the white Galaxy A54.

The Samsung Galaxy S23 is the cheapest way to get your hands on Samsung's latest flagship tech -- but you don't have to buy a flagship device to get a fantastic smartphone experience. Samsung's Galaxy A series of smartphones supplies excellent performance at a lower price tag, and the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the latest of these. With a strong processor, great camera suite, 120Hz refresh rate, and big battery — all wrapped inside a flagship-rivaling design — the Galaxy A54 is a very tempting midrange smartphone. But can it stand toe-to-toe with its more expensive cousin?

With stronger flagship specs, it's clear the Samsung Galaxy S23 has a significant edge here. But is the edge enough to justify significantly more dollars? We took a look at these two excellent smartphones so you have a better idea of which one to buy.
Samsung Galaxy A54 vs. Galaxy S23: specs

Read more
Samsung Galaxy S23 vs. iPhone 14: Apple’s grip is starting to slip
Samsung Galaxy S23 and iPhone 14.

The Samsung Galaxy S23 is an extremely capable smartphone, and with it comes the inevitable comparisons between Samsung's new 2023 handset and the now-established iPhone 14 that Apple launched last fall. Simply put, they're two of the best phones available today.

Both the Galaxy S23 and the iPhone 14 are the best smartphone for most folks within their respective ecosystems, so it's a pretty straightforward choice if you're already invested in Android or iOS. On the other hand, if you've been on the fence about which platform to go with, or you're considering a change, then it may be helpful to know how they stack up against each other.
Samsung Galaxy S23 vs. iPhone 14: specs

Read more
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs. iPhone 14 Pro Max: Apple better watch out
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and iPhone 14 Pro Max.

Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event was jam-packed with a ton of new hardware, including the Galaxy S23 series. This lineup includes the Galaxy S23, Galaxy S23 Plus, and the mega-powerful Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra. Despite there being three phones, the most exciting one is definitely the S23 Ultra, which now has a massive 200-megapixel main camera and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor that's specially tuned "for Galaxy".

But how does Samsung’s latest top-of-the-line flagship Android phone compare to Apple’s iPhone 14 Pro Max? Which one of these two massive, powerful phones should you buy? Let’s take a look at the two side by side.
Galaxy S23 Ultra vs. iPhone 14 Pro Max: specs

Read more