Skip to main content

These are the sites you’re wasting time on while at work

black friday cyber monday onlineshoppers targeted by hackers frustrated worker phil gradwell
Image used with permission by copyright holder

You’re going to finish reading that company memo. And you’re going to send those very important emails. It’s going to be an extremely productive day… but first you need to see if anyone retweeted you. And then just double-check to make sure your college roommate hasn’t written you back yet on Facebook. And then… and then… it’s 11 a.m. and you’re pretty sure you just got paid for looking at listicles about the world’s most adorable inter-species friendships for two hours. 

According to Forbes, 64 percent of employees visit non-work websites every day, while 29 percent waste one to two hours of work each week. They’re not the worst procrastination culprits, though, since 21 percent waste two to five hours, eight percent waste six to 10 hours, and a comically unproductive three percent waste more than 10 hours each week. 

The site most likely to make employees forget about that stack of papers on their desk: Tumblr. 

Since the site serves as a platform for engaged, enthusiastic digital communities, it seems people who use Tumblr can’t resist its siren song during their working hours. The next most popular website to browse on the clock is Facebook, which shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has ever worked in an office. Other culprits include Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat, so access to social media is certainly a time suck. 

In addition to looking at which sites are most often used as distractions from meaningless toil, Forbes also surveyed workers to find out why they wasted time. 34 percent of employees said not being challenged was the main reason they slipped into unproductive habits, while 30 percent said they were unsatisfied with their work and 23 percent said they were straight-up bored. Disturbingly, 25 percent of adults admitted to looking at pornographic material on a computer at work. And that’s just who admitted to it. 

This might seem like whining, and yes, there are many, many boring jobs that people need to do in order to keep a functional society operating. But 32 percent cited a lack of incentive as their impetus into Internet dillydallying, so here’s a thought: This situation requires making people want to be less lazy at their work. If the worker is truly disposable, employers could curtail this type of behavior by simply firing people more frequently for their digital malfeasance. If it is not cost-efficient to continually fire people and train new ones, however, employers are not likely to adopt draconian methods to cut down on this time-wasting. Also, since many employees have access to their personal mobile devices, it would be hard to enforce a no-personal Internet policy, if not impossible in certain workspaces.

The main offending group of Internet-obsessed workers were, to the surprise of absolutely no one, Millennials. While that’s fodder for another three billion op-eds about why the youth of  today are the worst, it’s also a sign that this is something employers are going to see more of, since whatever generation will follow the Millennial and take up the yoke as everyone’s least favorite most entitled disaster babies is going to be even more accustomed to constant connection and even less likely to separate themselves from their personal devices and eschew updating their social networks than those of us who fall under the Millennial umbrella. 

Since the ability to distract oneself from one’s profound alienation from labor is going to get even easier as wearable technologies and toting around multiple personal electronic devices becomes even more mainstream than it is now, employers are going to have to either accept that their workers are going to be Instagramming their lunch before they file those reports, or they’re going to have to incentivize people away from this kind of behavior. 

[Photo credit: Phil Gradwell, Flickr

Topics
Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more