Survey Finds Companies Aren’t Rushing to Windows 7

By Geoff Duncan July 13, 2009

Survey Finds Companies Aren

ScriptLogic makes its money helping enterprises, companies, and organizations manage their Windows-based networks. So, to get a feel for how companies were planning for Microsoft’s upcoming Windows 7 operating system, ScriptLogic send out 20,000 surveys to IT professionals and admins to find out how they felt about Windows 7. Some 1,000 surveys were returned, and the results find just 5.4 percent of companies plan to upgrade to Windows 7 by the end of 2009, and 34 percent plan to upgrade by the end of 2010. But, perhaps more ominous, 60 percent of respondents don’t plan to upgrade to Windows 7 at all.

Some forty-two percent of the companies responding said “lack of time and resources” was a principle factor in choosing to avoid Windows 7. Another 39 percent cited concerns over application compatibility, and another part of the survey found that some 35 percent of respondents had already put off upgrades and purchases in order to save money, potentially indicating the economic crunch has companies putting off hardware and software to shore up their bottom lines.

Many companies and enterprises did not shift to WIndows Vista due to concerns over both cost and software compatibility. Businesses that rely on specialized software or devices typically have to perform extensive testing before certifying an operating system for use in their organizations.

Before reading too much into the survey results, it’s important to remember that 1,000 respondents to 20,000 questionnaires represents only a 5 percent response rate, and those responders are self-selecting: both factors mean the results of the survey could be significantly different from trends among Windows-based businesses—let alone the wider the Windows-using world.

Editors' Recommendations

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

Input lag and response time aren’t the same. Here’s which is more important

Baldur's Gate 3 being played on the Alienware 32 QD-OLED.

Input lag and response time might sound like very similar metrics, and it's true they can both impact how your monitor or TV looks and feels, especially when you're gaming. But they are very different things, and while you ideally want them to be as low as possible for the best gaming experience, there are different thresholds for what's considered acceptable for each. And if you take your gaming seriously, one is more important than the other.

Here's how input lag and response time measure up and what you should look for when doing your next monitor upgrade.
What is input lag?

Computing

PC gamers — Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 are officially dead

Windows 10 running on the Steam Deck.

We all knew it was coming, but it's still sad to see Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 go. Valve announced that it ended support for the three operating systems on January 1, 2024, essentially ending the life of the storied operating systems for the small batch of PC gamers still using them. We had a great run.

Before we cry foul that Valve is shuttering Steam support for potential users, understand that Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 only make up a total of 0.89% of all Steam users. That's not an insignificant number of users -- there are 31 million online users on Steam at the time of writing, nearly 10 million of which are playing games -- but I'd wager a large number of those users either have other, newer PCs, or aren't active on Steam most days.

Computing

Why the Mac Studio offers something Windows PCs can’t compete with

Apple Mac Studio front view showing ports.

While Windows desktops offer fantastic alternatives to the Mac mini and Mac Pro, the Mac Studio continues to sit in its own unique sphere. Part compact PC and part powerhouse, it's the kind of device that's only possible thanks to the massive success of Apple Silicon.

When it comes down to it, that means nothing on the Windows side of the aisle can duplicate the kind of efficiency and performance the Mac Studio offers. I have a strong feeling that even with the Mac Studio currently being stuck on the M2 generation, that will remain true for a long time.
Specs and configurations