Skip to main content

Lamborghini still wants the Urus SUV, but Audi doesn’t think customers will

The Lamborghini Urus SUV is still on track for a 2017 launch, but corporate parent Audi thinks the Italian carmaker is waiting too long.

According to a recent report from Autocar, Audi still won’t give final approval for the Urus because it thinks customer demand will evaporate by the time Lambo can get it into production.

The main purpose of an SUV is to boost sales, but some Audi officials are reportedly concerned that the global economy is still too weak to support significant demand for the Urus, which will likely be one of the most expensive SUVs on the market.

Audi is particularly concerned that turmoil in the Middle East will curb demand n a key region for high-end car sales.

Related: Lamborghini Asterion LPI 910-4 hybrid unveiled at 2014 Paris Motor Show

This conservative outlook contrasts the views of other carmakers, including within the Volkswagen Group itself.

Bentley is planning to launch an SUV of its own, also in 2017, and is confident it will boost sales. Rolls-Royce sees so much customer demand for an SUV that it’s developing one even though people in charge of the company don’t really want to.

Even if sales turn out to be as low as Lambo’s supercars, the Urus should still prove highly profitable, because it will be based on existing VW Group components.

Based on a concept originally unveiled at the 2012 Beijing Motor Show, the Urus is expected to share a platform with the Audi Q7, Porsche Cayenne, and Volkswagen Touareg.

Instead of the normal Lamborghini V10 or V12, the Urus may also get a more normal powertrain based on something from the VW Group parts bin, with possible diesel and hybrid options.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more