Skip to main content

Local Motors LITECAR Challenge: ‘Adding lightness,’ improving fuel efficiency

As Lotus founder Colin Chapman famously said, the best way to improve a car is to “simplify, and add lightness.”

That maxim is becoming more important for carmakers every day, as they attempt to cut weight for better fuel efficiency, while still loading up their vehicles with the safety equipment and convenience features consumers demand.

ARPA-E and Local Motors hope to crack this problem with its LITECAR Challenge, which asks designers to create a “purely conceptual, novel lightweight vehicle” using any advanced technology or materials they can think of.

However, each entry must still meet current safety standards, and take the form of a conventional five-passenger sedan.

The goal of the contest is to find ways to unlock fuel economy savings by putting cars on a diet. Local notes that average new-car fuel economy has nearly double over the past 40 years, but average curb weights have remained stagnant.

It’s estimated that reducing a vehicle’s weight by 10 percent can boost fuel economy by 5 to 8 percent, but the beefy structures that allow cars to meet modern crashworthiness standards have to be preserved.

Since the LITECAR Challenge only includes concept vehicles, cost will likely be emphasized less. Yet in the real world, it is a major factor in attempts to make cars lighter.

That’s because, for now, it generally means using more-expensive materials like the aluminum used in the body of the 2015 Ford F-150, or the carbon fiber-reinforced plastic of BMW’s “i” cars.

Local will begin accepting entries for the LITECAR Challenge this Friday, and the deadline for submissions is March 6.

Each will be reviewed by a panel of judges, and the top prize is $60,000 cash.

Full details are available on the LITECAR Challenge website.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more