Skip to main content

Intel supports AMD in surprise adaptive-sync endorsement

Screen tearing in Batman game.
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Synchronising a display’s refresh rate with the FPS being output by the graphics card is important for gaming. Without it, we end up with screen tearing which can ruin immersion. With traditional technologies though, performance was limited.

Both AMD and Nvidia have released their own synchronizing technologies in recent years, but Intel looks to be siding with the VESA DisplayPort 1.2a standard that underlies AMD’s tech, as one of its key personnel has stated in an interview that it plans to support adaptive sync technology.

While he didn’t explicitly name AMD or Nvidia in his chat with TechReport, chief graphics software architect at Intel, David Blythe did say that Intel was inclined to support the optional extension  of the DisplayPort 1.2a specification. However, Blythe wouldn’t be drawn out on when that support would be implemented or with which products.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Related: Nvidia G-Sync or AMD FreeSync? Pick a side and stick with it

According to other unnamed sources, there are no immediate developments of Intel’s HD Graphics hardware to make it compatible with Adaptive Sync. This means that we will likely need to wait beyond Skylake to find any form of frame synching on variable refresh displays using Intel hardware only. However, perhaps in the future syncing frame rates will no longer require a dedicated GPU.

What will be worth watching is how the eventual support of an industry giant like Intel affects the landscape. As it stands, Nvidia’s GSync, while arguably the better of the technologies, is more expensive. AMD’s FreeSync doesn’t cost any extra to implement and has much less of an impact on frame rates.

Therefore, if Intel pushes for the unbranded solution, it will be interesting to see how well maintained and supported AMD and Nvidia’s alternative technology remains in the coming years.

Do any of you have FreeSync or GSync displays? Do you like the way the technology is implemented?

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Someone holding the Ryzen 7 5800X3D in a red light.

AMD's Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the crown jewel of gaming CPUs. It's the processor to buy in 2024 if you want a peak gaming experience, and with the processor still readily available for around $300, it's a great buy. However, it's not the gaming CPU for everyone. Despite the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's mythic status, there are several great alternatives.

We review the latest CPUs from Intel and AMD, testing their gaming prowess in the latest games, and there are some Ryzen 7 5800X3D alternatives that are cheaper, offer higher performance, or set you up better for future upgrades. Here are a few other CPUs to keep on your shortlist when you go to upgrade your PC.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Read more
AMD’s next version of FSR promises better visuals and support for Xbox
A logo of AMD's FSR 3.

At GDC 2024, AMD has announced an update to FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), its upscaling tech for improving frame rates in games. FSR 3.1 brings some predicted improvements to image quality and stability, but with it, also some changes to how it's positioned as a platform.

The main tweak is that FSR 3.1 frame generation is now "decoupled" from FSR upscaling for the purpose of working "with other upscaling solutions." Presumably, this means with Intel's XeSS or Nvidia's DLSS. This hopefully also means that you can toggle off frame generation from FSR 3, just like you can with DLSS, giving you more minute control of performance. As one user shared on Reddit, this would also be helpful for those on older RTX GPUs, combining DLSS with AMD's frame generation.

Read more