Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Reviews

2018 Toyota C-HR first drive

Toyota’s edgy C-HR targets millennials, but forgets the tech

By

Innovative styling is countered by a lack of connectivity, and stellar safety technology is countered by horrendous visibility.

Mainstream automakers are chained to the beast they helped create. Crossovers, the new automotive currency, have saturated every corner of the market in an appeal to consumers of all demographics. Americans can’t get enough, and manufacturers can’t build them fast enough.

Unfortunately, while some companies successfully adapt their personalities to the crossover segment, others seem to be jamming a square peg in a round hole, resulting in products that just don’t make sense. Reaching a new audience requires risk, and only with clear direction will the gamble pay off.

Such is the tumultuous market into which the 2018 Toyota C-HR enters. The “Coupe High Rider” is uncharted territory for a traditionally conservative Japanese brand. Bold aesthetics in a sub-compact body would have been perfect for Toyota’s youth-oriented – yet shuttered – Scion brand, but the C-HR is too late to rescue that damsel.

With a number of competitor crossovers already on sale, the C-HR faces an uphill battle to earn Toyota new market share. To stand any chance, its out-there looks must be backed by class-leading technology, fuel economy, and versatility. Is the C-HR a square peg or the perfect fit?

Filling the senses

Toyota says it’s happy to sell the C-HR to other demographics, but the vehicle has been designed expressly with Millennials in mind. The world of focus groups, surveys, and field trials is a mysterious one, but Toyota’s market research division has evidently concluded that young buyers want conspicuous cars.

The 2018 Toyota C-HR is nothing if not audacious. Each body panel has been contorted, sliced, and folded. The design is less cohesive than a Miami Beach block. Toyota points to its “distinctive diamond” styling cue as the glue for the overall C-HR aesthetic, but that feels more like an excuse for the vehicle’s creases than anything. It’s all over the place…and yet, somehow, it works. By all accounts, a mass-market entry-level crossover shouldn’t be this bold. Forgetting its place, however, the C-HR and its frenetic styling is refreshing.

I can’t tell you if the C-HR’s styling will age well, but for now, it’s one of the most eye-catching shapes on the road.

At the front, the C-HR is characterized by a triangular snout, slender headlights with LED daytime running lights, and slanted lower air intakes. Standard 18-inch wheels are by far my favorite rim designs in the segment and sit well within the C-HR’s flared wheel arches. In profile, the crossover really does look like a coupe thanks to its low-slung stance, sharply raised C-pillar, and floating roofline. The rear features Honda Civic-esque C-shaped taillights, a trunk-mounted spoiler, and perhaps a bit too much black cladding on the lower bumper.

Toyota will offer R-Code edition models with a white roof that contrasts three body colors: Blue Eclipse Metallic, Ruby Flare Pearl, and Radiant Green Mica. On a different car, the white top might be gimmicky, but the C-HR’s design embraces the accent.

Without a crystal ball (mine’s still in storage), I can’t tell you if the C-HR’s styling will age well, but for now, it’s one of the most eye-catching shapes on the road.

Dynamically confusing

Beyond its futuristic looks, Toyota’s C-HR suffers from a case of mistaken identity. The Japanese automaker says it honed the new crossover’s driving dynamics on the Nurburgring, yet the average Millennial has probably never heard of such a place.

Toyota USA
Toyota

The C-HR shares its platform with Toyota’s latest Prius. The TNGA (Toyota New Global Architecture), which will underpin several new models in the coming years, is fantastic – especially for a non-performance vehicle. The C-HR’s low center of gravity and stiff platform pair well with its MacPherson strut front suspension and double-wishbone rear suspension to control a portly 3,300 pounds. To my immense surprise, the C-HR handles just as well or better than Mazda’s CX-3 – the sub-compact crossover segment’s dynamic benchmark.

Equally surprising is the C-HR’s steering. Electric steering racks are a tricky thing – overboosted systems are twitchy and annoying, but overly dulled calibrations are just as bad. Toyota dialed in its steering system almost perfectly – my only knock is that inputs take a split second to process before the vehicle responds as instructed.

That edgy C-pillar may look cool, but it also becomes a giant blind spot for the driver.

Alas, these two highlights are muddled by an anemic powertrain. The 2018 C-HR will ship with one powertrain and one transmission. A 2.0-liter four-cylinder and CVT (continuously variable transmission) combination delivers 144 horsepower and 139 pound-feet of torque to the front wheels. All-wheel drive is not an option. In a lighter body, this might be an acceptable output, but the C-HR feels downright slow when prodded. Around town, the lack of grunt is hardly noticeable, but at highway speeds, the crossover wheezes along.

“Wait,” you might reason, “surely Toyota has done this to produce strong fuel economy numbers.” Sadly, no. The C-HR returns 27 mpg in the city, 31 on the highway, and 29 combined. These figures are merely acceptable for a compact, front-wheel drive crossover. For comparison, the Honda HR-V gets 31 combined and the (far more powerful) Nissan Juke gets 30.

The C-HR’s handling is certainly impressive, but a lackluster powertrain doesn’t exactly beg to be pushed.

Techno-flop

If I stop the review here, you might (reasonably) consider the C-HR a competitive subcompact crossover, but there’s one big, glaring problem: Toyota forgot the technology. In other words, the Millennials Toyota cares so much about are not going to be happy.

Toyota has nailed one aspect of the C-HR’s innovation: safety features. Families will be pleased to hear that Toyota’s robust suite of safety technologies (Toyota Safety Sense) comes standard on the C-HR. That means pre-collision warning with active braking, lane departure warning with steering assist, dynamic cruise control, and adaptive high beams are part of the base trim’s $22,500 package. This safety bundle isn’t just good for the segment – it’s unmatched. Specifically, pre-collision and dynamic cruise control (which works all the way to 0 mph) isn’t even offered on rivaling entry-level crossovers.

Miles Branman/Digital Trends
Miles Branman/Digital Trends

However, these safety features face a major design flaw: the C-HR’s rearward visibility is atrocious. That edgy C-pillar may look cool, but it also becomes a giant blind spot for the driver. A narrow rear window compounds the problem; getting a clear look in any direction except forward is extremely difficult. XLE Premium models give drivers a chance with standard blind spot monitoring, but base XLE models can be downright dangerous. Yet another conflicting move is Toyota’s decision to put the (standard) backup camera in the rearview mirror. Instead of putting the camera view into the 7.0-inch infotainment system, Toyota attempts to show a wide field of rear view in a tiny embedded screen.

Millennials may be tough to understand, but skipping connectivity features is a clear no-no.

Speaking of the 7.0-inch infotainment system, it might as well be dead space. The low-resolution touchscreen can be used to access AM/FM/HD Radio, Bluetooth, the Aha music app, and iPod connectivity. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto aren’t available, nor is Sirius XM. There’s also a single USB port in both the XLE and Premium grades. Toyota won’t impress any tech-savvy shoppers with this level of connectivity.

The rest of the interior is equally underwhelming. You can choose from several exterior colors, but the cabin only comes in black and the seating surfaces are cloth in both trims. Apart from a couple high-quality touch points like the leather-wrapped steering wheel and a soft-textured dashboard, it’s a tale of hard plastics and wasted storage space.

Needs improvement

Tallying up the 2018 C-HR’s strengths and weaknesses, it appears Toyota doesn’t fully understand its target market. Innovative styling is cut at the knees by a lack of segment-competitive connectivity, and stellar safety technology is countered by horrendous interior visibility. Millennials (myself included) may be tough to understand, but skipping connectivity features is a clear no-no.

The C-HR’s one saving grace may be its price tag. At $22,500, the XLE comes with a number of standard styling features that will resonate with a particular buyer. Those who can see past the C-HR’s flaws to gain trend-setting design have their crossover mate. Everyone else has a number of more qualified options.

Highs:

  • Exceptional handling
  • Unique, eye-catching styling
  • Segment-leading safety features

Lows:

  • Lackluster powertrain
  • Poor visibility
  • Underwhelming technology

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Miles Branman
Miles Branman
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Miles Branman doesn't need sustenance; he needs cars. While the gearhead gene wasn't strong in his own family, Miles…
Hyundai Ioniq 6 first drive review: welcome to the future
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6.

While some automakers are just beginning to get into electric cars, Hyundai's EVs have already taken several evolutionary steps. From the Ioniq Electric to the Kona Electric to the Ioniq 5, the South Korean brand's EVs have steadily become more sophisticated in tech and design. And Hyundai isn't stopping.

The 2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 is a follow-up to the Ioniq 5, wrapping the earlier model's hardware in very different styling. With the Ioniq 5 and most other EVs from mainstream brands are marketed as crossover SUVs, this sedan doesn't have much direct competition. Hyundai set out to compete with the Tesla Model 3 and Polestar 2, which is reflected in its comparable pricing — between $42,715 for the base version and $57,425 for the most expensive model. But constantly fluctuating Tesla prices and build configurations mean that may not be the case for long.

Read more
2023 Kia Niro EV first drive review: Practical doesn’t have to bore you to tears
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Kia Niro EV.

If you want to see just how quickly the electric car landscape has changed over the past few years, take a look at the redesigned 2023 Kia Niro EV.
When the first-generation Niro EV launched for the 2019 model year (following hybrid and plug-in hybrid Niro variants), it was a pretty big deal. The Niro was Kia’s first EV not based on a conventional gasoline model, and the first intended for high sales volumes.
The second-generation 2023 Niro EV boasts more tech, more space, and more extroverted styling than its predecessor, but it’s still very much in the shadow of the Kia EV6. Once Kia’s main EV attraction, the Niro is being refocused as a more affordable option to take on the likes of the Chevrolet Bolt EV/Bolt EUV, Volkswagen ID.4, and Nissan Leaf.
Kia plans to offer the Niro EV in trim levels named Wind and Wave, but hasn’t released pricing for either. Note that the previous-generation 2022 Niro EV started at $41,245; the new model could see a price increase because of its updates. And because it’s assembled in South Korea, the 2023 Niro EV won’t qualify for the revamped federal EV tax credit, Kia has confirmed.

Design and interior
Like the previous generation, the Niro is part of a three-pronged lineup that also includes the Niro Hybrid and Niro PHEV (plug-in hybrid models). All three maintain the tall-wagon shape of the first-generation Niro, but with much bolder styling.
Where the previous Niro was a wishy-washy mix of car and SUV styling elements, the 2023 Niro is the result of the same fearless design department that produced the EV6 and the 2023 Kia Sportage. The traditional automotive “face” was rearranged with a visor-like element, protruding grille, and hexagonal lighting elements. Contrasting trim panels break up the profile view, and conceal “Air Blade” elements around the taillights that, Kia claims, reduce aerodynamic drag.
Kia used sustainable materials to further decrease the Niro EV’s environmental impact.

Read more
2022 Volkswagen ID. Buzz first drive review: The iconic hippie hauler goes electric
Volkwagen's ID. Buzz drives down the road.

Volkswagen's growing family of ID-badged electric cars has a new mascot: the ID. Buzz. Inspired by the vintage air-cooled Bus models and previewed by a close-to-production concept unveiled in 2017, the heritage-laced van offers an electric powertrain, an eye-catching design, plus an interior that's high-tech and almost lounge-like. I tested a Buzz prototype in England in February 2022 and walked away impressed, and time driving a regular-production model in and around Copenhagen, Denmark, confirmed these impressions. This was worth the wait.
Design and interior
While you can tell that the Buzz is on the same branch of the Volkswagen family tree as the split- and bay-window Buses prized by hippies decades ago, designers decided not to go full-retro as they did with the New Beetle released in 1997. The headlights aren't round, for example, and they're much higher than the original van's. It's the same story out back: The lights are horizontal, located right below the big hatch's window, and connected by a light bar. This is intentional -- Volkswagen aimed to echo the original model without cloning it.

In terms of proportions, the Buzz is pretty spot on. The front end isn't entirely flat and the front doors are positioned behind the front wheels rather than over them, but the design is as close to the old van's as modern regulations allow. The Buzz variant that I drove in Denmark measures 185.5 inches long, 78.1 inches wide, and 76.8 inches tall, so it's about as long as a Tiguan but around 10 inches taller and five inches wider. This is what Volkswagen refers to as the short-wheelbase model, and it's not coming to the United States. We'll get a long-wheelbase model that hasn't been unveiled yet; it should look just like the European-spec model but with more space between the front and rear axles.

Read more