Skip to main content

They really do have 9 lives: Jaguar reincarnates the 1963 Lightweight E-TYPE

Carmakers often try to recapture the magic of past products with retro styling and nostalgic names, but it’s uncommon for one to literally rebuild one of these legendary models.

Yet that’s exactly what Jaguar is doing with the Lightweight E-TYPE, a racing version of the iconic sports car that debuted in 1963. Instead of ripping the sound insulation out of an F-TYPE, Jag will actually bring back it ’60s forebear for a limited production run.

The Lightweight E-TYPE was built for European GT racing, and featured an aluminum monocoque chassis, as well as aluminum body panels and an aluminum hard top. Its 3.8-liter straight six featured an aluminum block for further weight savings. The finished cars weighed around 250 pounds less than a standard E-TYPE.

It sounds like the recipe for a successful racer, but it was not to be. While the Lightweight was raced by greats like Jackie Stewart and Graham Hill, it was soon outclassed by more advanced cars like the Ferrari 250 GTO.

Jaguar didn’t exactly need a racing program to promote the popular E-TYPE, so only 12 of the planned 18 cars were produced. Eleven of the originals are believed to survive today.

That’s where Jaguar’s new scheme comes in. The company views it not just as a plan to reproduce these rare cars, but also to complete the original production run by building those “missing six”.

The six cars will be hand-built by Jaguar to the original specifications, and will feature the same 3.8-liter straight-six engine. It’s unclear what will be done with them once they’re completed, but expect to pay a lot to put one in your garage.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more