Skip to main content

Mazda mulls diesel engine option for next-gen MX-5

Mazda MX-5 logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

We giddily reported back in January that Mazda and Alfa Romeo were combining forces to design a next-generation MX-5 that would lend its underpinnings to an all-new Alfa roadster. While the drop top sports coupe would be a co-engineering project, the car would be built and assembled by Mazda in Japan, which seemingly allays most our concerns with Alfa in the first place.

This made us ecstatic and incredibly frustrated – all at the same time. Now we’d have to choose between the Mazda and the Alfa, both of which will have their own distinctive looks and engines.

Now Mazda is making the decision even tougher as it is reportedly debating the inclusion of an optional diesel SKYACTIV engine under the hood of the lightweight convertible, according to Autocar.

Some wonder if a diesel-powered soft-top would sell. We would wonder the same thing if we hadn’t just driven the 2013 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible TDI with a turbocharged four-cylinder diesel and a six-speed manual transmission. It was brilliant.

If Mazda can get anywhere near the brilliance of the Beetle, we’ll be sold. Arguably the Mazda will be more reliable and manlier looking than the Beetle ‘vert so it should be a slam-dunk.

Right now, aside from its looks, the only thing the Alfa variant has over the Mazda is its turbocharged engine offerings. Mazda seems set on sticking with its normally aspirated SKYACTIV engines for the new MX-5. If we’re totally honest: SKYACTIV is noisy and slow.

The new MX-5 has a target weight of 1,700 pounds, however. So even if the engine is a bit anemic, Mazda should have a fun little sports car.

With what you know so far, which would you rather have? An MX-5 or an Alfa built by the Japanese? Tell us in the comment section below.

Editors' Recommendations

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more