Skip to main content

Ford plans to drop Microsoft from SYNC and picks up Blackberry – UPDATE

microsoft falling behind auto tech ford sync
Image used with permission by copyright holder

When Ford released it’s revolutionary SYNC system in conjunction with Microsoft, it was all the rage. But soon after it’s release, almost every other car company released their own, better, non-Microsoft version.

Over time, problems mounted with the SYNC system, including, but not limited to, random blackouts of electronics … for no explained reason.

Ford has inexplicably stuck by the Washington-based tech powerhouse. That is, until now. According to Bloomberg, Ford is planning to partner with Blackberry’s QNX division.

Now I already know what everyone is thinking: “Blackberry? They haven’t been relevant since before Barack Obama was President.”

While the company’s mobile phone sales are essentially lost to the ages, the QNX division provides infotainment systems for companies such as BMW, Audi, and Porsche. Anyone whose used the SYNC system and Audi’s MMI system will tell you there’s no comparison.

Although a few years late, this move is a great step for Ford. It wants to stay competitive in the in car technology market, which is becoming a significant factor for people searching for a new set of wheels.

With the move, Ford also gets a breather from Microsoft’s heavy license fees. The change doesn’t exactly have any good side for Microsoft, which had been buddy-buddy enough to consider Ford’s CEO as its next in line to steer the ship.

Microsoft is falling fast behind in in-car technology. Especially considering foggy partnership between Apple and Tesla and Ford’s seeking greener pastures, it might seem Microsoft has lost the car game.

Update: Ford has not made an official announcement, instead the information is originally sourced from Bloomberg.

Trevor Dermody
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more