Skip to main content

NHTSA drafts guidelines to minimize distracted driving, but carmakers don’t have to follow them

NHTSA drafts guidelines to minimize distracted driving, but carmakers don't have to follow them
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Infotainment systems and personal tech items have allowed car owners to take their tech-filled lifestyles on the road, but they have also greatly increased the number of distractions in vehicles.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned about distracted driving, so it is releasing a set of guidelines designed to keep things safe. The guidelines elucidate ways for carmakers to build less distracting tech, but they are also completely voluntary.

The guidelines establish criteria for in-car electronics that require drivers to turn their attention away from the road to use. Under the guidelines, a driver shouldn’t have to take his or her eyes off the road for more than two seconds at a time and 12 seconds total to perform any task.

The guidelines also recommend disabling manual text entry (for both texting and internet browsing), video playing, and other functions while a car is in motion.

The recommendations aren’t just limited to restricting information by medium. Displaying certain types of content, including text messages and social media posts, also falls in the “not while the vehicle is in motion” category, as are photorealistic or dynamic images on navigation system maps.

The guidelines also cover the location of electronic devices in a car, including the distance a touch screen or other control surface is from the driver, and the positioning of displays as close as possible to the driver’s line of sight.

The NHTSA guidelines are based on the findings of a study conducted by the agency.

“The new study strongly suggests that visual-manual tasks can degrade a driver’s focus and increase the risk of getting into a crash up to three times,” NHTSA Administrator David L. Strickland said in a statement.

The study found that sending a text message required a driver to take his or her eyes of the road for an average of 23.3 seconds, and doubled the chance of a crash.

Actually talking on a cell phone made a crash 1.73 times more likely, but the entire process of picking up the phone, searching for a contact, and dialing made a crash three times more likely, because each step takes a driver’s hand (or hands) off the wheel and their eyes off the road.

The study focused on handheld phone use, but did not investigate infotainment functions unrelated to calling and texting.

Do you think tech gadgetry is making cars unsafe? What’s the solution? Tell us in the comments.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more