Skip to main content

Highly anticipated Tesla Autopilot 8.0 release to roll out in July

tesla model s autopilot expected update crash death
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Against the backdrop of last week’s news of a May 7 fatality involving a Tesla Model S running on Autopilot, Tesla will soon roll out out a highly-anticipated release of the Autopilot software, reports Electrek. The timing of the upgrade will undoubtedly now draw some public attention, but details of the new release and its anticipated deployment were previously reported by Electrek and elsewhere.

Autopilot 8.0 is expected to download in the next few weeks to approximately 80,000 Tesla vehicles. Autopilot 8.0 will add some new features and strengthen others. The new software is considered a major update, but it will still be a hands-on-the-wheel assisted driving program that requires drivers to be able to take over control of the vehicle on a moment’s notice.

The results of an investigation of the fatal accident by Florida law enforcement and a preliminary investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are still forthcoming. There are plenty of contradictory stories flying, however, about the whether Joshua Brown was watching a Harry Potter film on a portable DVD player, the speed at which the car was moving, and even Brown’s age.

There have also been conflicting stories about whether the car was designed to avoid a vehicle coming in from the side. Tesla autopilot supplier Mobileye said its system in the 2015 Model S only looks forward.  Tesla’s Elon Musk, however, has since stated that the Mobileye technology is only part of sensor and Autopilot system. He stated that the side sensors would have detected the truck but because of its plain white surface and height, the system may have confused it with a highway sign. Regardless, the autonomous system did not prevent the accident, nor did the driver.

This accident, reportedly the first fatality in 130 million aggregate miles of driving with Autopilot engaged, has raised several questions about the rush to self-driving technology. There is a question about releasing a beta system for use on public roads, even if users are informed. Another question is whether the technology worked as designed. Another, and perhaps the greatest question of all, concerns whether people can “collaborate” safely with driver-assisted vehicles.

The evidence of too many people recording videos as they self-test the Tesla’s ability to drive itself is as disheartening as it is scary. In some cases, videos show people testing their Teslas by having friends jump in front of the moving car to see if it will stop.

It’s worthy of note that Joshua Brown had a near-accident a month before the fatality, and in the prior incident, he credited Autopilot for saving his life by successfully maneuvering to safety when a boom truck whose driver apparently didn’t see Brown’s car cut into and across his lane. Brown showed a video of the event and, after crediting Autopilot for saving him, still asserted that drivers had to be ready to take control, that Autopilot was not ready yet to fully control cars.

Autopilot 8.0, as announced, will have a new user interface, automatic off-ramp driving, routing based on remaining energy in the car’s batteries, and new navigation, route planning, and media handling. There will also be an update of the whole Autopilot feature set based on the accumulated one billion plus miles of driving data transmitted by Tesla cars with Autopilot hardware, whether engaged or not.

An even more significant upgrade to the Tesla autonomous feature set will be Autopilot 2.0, which will include hardware in the form of a new sensor suite which will enable more driver-assisted and autonomous driving. No date has been announced for Autopilot 2.0.

Editors' Recommendations

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Commerce teams. Bruce uses smart devices…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more