Skip to main content

Would you buy a Jaguar ‘Q-Type’ or ‘XQ’ crossover? Jaguar is hoping so

Jaguar wagon
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Jaguar is making a big push to increase its global standing. Jaguar recently released the Porsche-fighting F-Type and has a BMW 3 Series compact sedan competitor in development. While these are good starts, they’re not quite enough to seriously compete with the Germans on a global scale.

As it stands, crossovers make up one third of total global auto sales. Although such a product might not be in keeping with Jag’s history, a compact CUV will be essential to its ongoing success.

Realizing this, Jaguar has filed with the European Union’s Patent and Trademark Office an application for the nameplates “Q-Type” and “XQ,” according to Leftlane News.

The next decision the engineers at Jaguar have to decide is which platform to use for its new crossovers. Should they use the Range Rover Evoque platform and drivetrain, from their sister company, Land Rover, which is readily and cheaply available to them? Or repurpose the all-new compact sedan platform in development? If the F-Type is any indication of what the company is capable of going forward, either platform will make for a brilliant Jag CUV.

While we like the idea of a sporty, compact Jaguar crossover, we’re really rather tired of the letter Q. Audi has its Q line of crossovers and Infiniti has recently rebadged all its SUVs and CUVs as “QX.” Can’t the creative minds at Jag think of a better letter? Of the 26 up for grabs, Jag has only used a couple. Why it feels the need to jump on the Q bandwagon is beyond us.

Oh, and are we the only ones who think “Q-Type” is a bit too close to “Q-Tips” for comfort?

Editors' Recommendations

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Mercedes-Benz G580 first drive: old-school off-roader goes electric
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

American car buyers mostly know Mercedes-Benz as a luxury brand. But for decades, the automaker has also produced the tough, rugged G-Class (also known as the Geländewagen or G-Wagen), an SUV not afraid to get its leather upholstery muddy. And now, this iconic Mercedes is going electric.

The 2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology — the final name of the SUV previously known as the EQG — isn’t the first electric off-roader. The Rivian R1S and R1T and GMC Hummer EV have proven that electric powertrains and off-roading are a great combination. But the electric G-Wagen is different because it’s based on an internal-combustion model — and a very traditional one at that.

Read more
Honda believes hydrogen semi trucks will make the case for fuel cells
Honda hydrogen fuel-cell semi truck.

Honda remains committed to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles, but the market for those vehicles remains limited. So Honda is looking at other uses for fuel cells -- including commercial trucks.

To show how that could work, Honda converted a semi truck to fuel-cell power, replacing its diesel engine with three fuel-cell modules. Together, the three modules produce a combined 321 horsepower, and can propel the truck to a top speed of 70 mph. There's enough onboard hydrogen storage capacity for a 400-mile range with a full load, Honda claims.

Read more
Mercedes-Benz G580 vs Rivian R2: Is the much cheaper Rivian actually better?
2025 Mercedes-Benz G580 from three quarter view.

Mercedes-Benz has finally taken the wraps off of the new "Mercedes-Benz G580 with EQ Technology." Yeah, it's a mouthful, but it's basically a new electric G-Wagon. It looks a lot like the G-Wagon you know and love, but with an electric powertrain and a battery. It's not the only electric SUV out there, however, and there are some great ones -- like the Rivian R2.

Both the Mercedes G580 and the Rivian R2 have a lot going for them, but they also approach the electric SUV slightly differently. Is one better than the other? I put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The approach that the two vehicles take to design is quite different -- and you might like one better than the other.

Read more