Skip to main content

AMD ‘basically lies’ about Computex benchmark, YouTuber says

AMD's CEO delivering the Computex 2024 presentation.
AMD

AMD is coming under some fire for performance data it shared following its Computex 2024 keynote. Thankfully, the data in question doesn’t concern AMD’s upcoming Ryzen 9000 CPUs, which are slated to launch in July. Instead, it concerns the performance numbers AMD shared for its repackaged Ryzen 9 5900 XT and Ryzen 7 5800 XT CPUs, which are built on the aging Zen 3 architecture.

In a monthly Q&A, YouTube channel Hardware Unboxed broke down the performance numbers. In AMD’s presentation, it showed the Ryzen 9 5900 XT and Ryzen 7 5800 XT beating the Intel competition by a few points in games. AMD compared the CPUs to the Core i7-13700K and Core i5-13600K, respectively, and showed its CPUs beating Intel by upwards of 12% in some games. Hardware Unboxed says that data isn’t an accurate representation, however.

This Is BAD, AMD Basically Lies About CPU Performance: June Q&A [Part 2]

If you dig into the footnotes of AMD’s slides, you’ll find the configurations for these benchmarks. AMD tested these CPUs with the rather weak RX 6600 graphics card. This creates an environment where games are limited by the graphics card, meaning you’ll see little to no difference in performance when comparing two CPUs. And sure enough, short of a 12% increase in Cyberpunk 2077 on the Ryzen 7 5800 XT, all of the data AMD shared shows an increase of around 1% to 2%.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Hardware Unboxed pulled its own data for similar Zen 3 CPUs and found that the Core i7-13700K should be around 36% faster than the Ryzen 9 5900 XT when not constrained by the GPU. Similarly, it says the Core i5-13600K should be about 28% faster than the Ryzen 7 5800 XT. In our Core i5-13600K review, we found similar results, as you can see in the chart below. In Far Cry 6, for example, the Core i5-13600K was about 23% faster than the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Intel Raptor Lake performance in Far Cry 6.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

It shouldn’t come as a surprise, either. Intel’s 13th-gen chips use a much newer architecture than AMD’s Zen 3 offerings, and they can handle the newer DDR5 memory standard. No one would expect a Ryzen 5000 CPU to outperform an Intel 13th-gen CPU. Hardware Unboxed says it’s strange that AMD included performance data in the first place considering how much older Ryzen 5000 is compared to Intel’s more recent offerings.

Benchmarks for the Ryzen 9 5900 XT.
AMD

In fairness to AMD, these new Ryzen 5000 parts weren’t the star of the show during AMD’s Computex keynote. In fact, they were barely a footnote. AMD didn’t share the data you see above during the presentation, nor did it even name the new Ryzen 5000 CPUs that are coming out. The performance data was instead shared privately with press. Taking a quick look around online, these slides — and the Ryzen 9 5900 XT and Ryzen 7 5800 XT as a whole — didn’t receive much attention.

The keynote itself was instead focused on Ryzen 9000 and AMD’s upcoming Ryzen AI 300 processors for Copilot+ PCs. Although it’s never good to see misleading benchmarks, AMD likely has more problems with its new Zen 5 parts. AMD itself says they won’t beat last-gen’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D in gaming performance.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
It’s the end of an era for AMD
An AMD Ryzen CPU socketed in a motherboard.

AMD is following Intel's lead. The company is rebranding its Ryzen CPUs to closely align with what Intel is doing, shifting away from a long product string toward a three-digit part number that includes the phrase everyone is talking about: AI.

Starting with the new Strix Point CPUs, which sport the Zen 5 architecture, AMD is using "Ryzen AI" to differentiate its processors. In addition, instead of a string of four digits noting everything from the year released to the architecture the chip uses, AMD is using a three-digit part number, matching what Intel kicked off with its Meteor Lake CPUs.

Read more
AMD just answered the question everyone’s been asking about Ryzen 9000
AMD announcing its Zen 5 CPUs at Computex.

It's not surprising that AMD released its Ryzen 9000 CPUs at Computex 2024. The company confirmed its Zen 5 chips would arrive this year, and Computex is the perfect place to release them. AMD answered two big questions about Ryzen 9000 in Taipei, however: When does Ryzen 9000 come out, and how long will AM5 last?

Let's start with that last question. AMD committed to supporting the AM5 platform through 2025 originally, but with the launch of Ryzen 9000, it's recommitting. The company says it will support AM5 through at least 2027, and likely beyond that point. Everything works together, too. New Ryzen 9000 parts will work with older 600-series chipsets, while older Ryzen 7000 CPUs will work with the new 800-series chipset (more on that shortly).

Read more
Asus is axing one major feature with the ROG Ally X
The Asus ROG Ally X playing Armored Core VI.

Asus is giving up on one of the most unique aspects of the ROG Ally with its new model. The ROG Ally X is official, and as a string of teases and leaks suggested, it overhauls Asus' handheld gaming PC in every way. In the process of upgrading the device, though, Asus gave up on its XG Mobile ecosystem that made the original device stand out so much.

The original ROG Ally includes a large, proprietary connector for one of Asus' external XG Mobile GPUs. This allowed you to connect the handheld to a more powerful graphics card, as well as a slew of I/O (input/output), with a single cable. As we discovered while testing the XG Mobile, it doesn't work quite the way you'd expect. Driver conflicts don't give you the seamless experience Asus promised, and Asus is finally recognizing that fact.

Read more