Skip to main content

This is Intel’s first desktop graphics card, and I just played Warframe on it

This story is part of our continuing coverage of CES 2020, including tech and gadgets from the showroom floor.

CES announcements are nearing their end, but Intel has one more reveal, and it’s big. Intel gave Digital Trends and a small group of media outlets a world-first look at the desktop version of the company’s upcoming desktop graphics card, the Intel DG1.

The desktop Intel DG1 was there in the flesh, running in a desktop system. The card was powering the popular free-to-play shooter Warframe, which isn’t known for slaying graphics cards. Even so, the game plodded along at a tepid 30 frames per second at 1080p resolution. It wasn’t too impressive. The framerate was visibly choppy and screen tearing was a noticeable issue.

intel DG1
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Intel insists you shouldn’t write off the project based on that. That’s because the Intel DG1 I tested isn’t anywhere close to the final card. It’s what Intel calls a “software development vehicle,” meant to prepare its partners in the developer community for the eventual wide-scale release of the DG1 and other Intel Xe graphics solutions. In other words, the final graphics card you might end up buying won’t look like this early sample.

Intel says this is an important step towards a successful consumer launch. Xe is, after all, a brand new platform for developers to adopt, and Intel is determined to ease developers and software vendors into optimizing for it.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s a lot of truth to what Intel says. There’s no release date for Intel’s Xe discrete graphics card and, unlike Nvidia and AMD, Intel is building this architecture from the ground up. Intel simply lacks the cache of its competition in this field. Sending cards to developers as an early proof of concept is always part of designing a new architecture, but it’s particularly important for Intel’s entry into discrete graphics.

Intel has a number of AI-powered performance boosts that require optimization and close partnership with developers. These new capabilities are selling points for Intel’s marketing of Xe, and Intel says it’s important it all works on day one.

It looks finished, even if it isn’t

The many caveats surrounding this early sneak peak at Intel DG1 might make you think the card itself is just a PCB with a fan held on by a paperclip. Nope! The DG1 is an attractive piece of hardware that doesn’t look far off most retail graphics cards.

It features a swanky aluminum shroud, a stylish Xe logo on the back, and programmable RGB lighting. The design uses a single blower fan for cooling, and the shroud wraps around the fan in a way that suggests airflow. It looks like a piece of high-end graphics kit, yet it’s not as intimidating as the black-and-gray monoliths shipped by AMD and Nvidia.

The card I saw had three DisplayPort connections and an HDMI port across the rear. I doubt that’s indicative of what the final Intel Xe cards will ship with. Developers are more willing to use dongles than consumers, who will certainly demand HDMI, at the least.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Intel declined on any information about pricing, performance, or release date. The company also wouldn’t say where this particular card might land in the final line-up, or if it will even ship to retail.

From the look of it, and its performance, I’d guess the Intel DG1 represents an entry-level graphics product. The most powerful Intel Xe cards are almost certain to be larger, beefier pieces of hardware, similar to what AMD and Nvidia produce.

The secret is out

As a whole, the company has been secretive about the exact details of its new Xe graphics architecture. At its CES 2020 press conference earlier this week, Intel gave the world a very brief look at the mobile version of the DG1, with almost no details about what it was (outside of its ability to play Destiny 2).

What we do know, however, is that the Xe architecture will be shared across the entire lineup of graphics cards, ranging from high performance computing to low performance machines, with micro-architectures optimized for each sector.

Intel says it’s already sampling the DG1 to developers, and will continue to do so throughout the rest of 2020. We’re sure to hear more about it, and other Intel Xe hardware, this year.

Follow our live blog for more CES news and announcements.

Luke Larsen
Luke Larsen is the Senior editor of computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's Core i9-13900K is one of the best processors you can buy. The 24-core behemoth can rip through productivity workloads with ease, and it's easily one of the fastest gaming CPUs money can buy. Even with so much power under the hood, it's not the right choice for everyone.

Supreme power comes at a supreme cost, and for the Core i9-13900K, that comes in the form of heat and power draw. In addition, a recent wave of instability has hit Intel's high-end CPUs like the Core i9-13900K, making alternatives a bit more attractive.

Read more
AMD’s graphics card sales just took a nosedive
RX 7900 XTX installed in a test bench.

AMD may make some of the best graphics cards you can buy, but they aren't selling well. In its financial results for the first quarter of 2024,  AMD shared that gaming revenue was down 33% compared to the previous quarter, and down 48% compared to the same point last year.

In total, AMD brought in $922 million in its gaming segment in the first quarter. For reference, in Nvidia's previous revenue report, it reported $2.9 billion for its gaming segment. AMD attributes the drop in revenue to "a decrease in semi-custom revenue and lower AMD Radeon GPU sales."

Read more
I’ve used Intel CPUs for years. Here’s why I’m finally switching to AMD
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

I've been using Intel CPUs for close to seven years. It started with the Core i7-8700K, but I moved on to the Core i9-10900K, Core i9-12900K, and most recently, the Core i9-13900K, all of which could have occupied a slot among the best processors at different points in time. But after so much time with Team Blue, I'm switching back to AMD.

It comes at an interesting time for Intel and the PC hardware community as a whole, which is currently abuzz about a particular article claiming that Intel is objectively "better" for PC gamers. That's not what this article is. Instead, I want to walk you through why I chose to use AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D in my gaming PC, and how I came to the decision.
Stability struggles
The Intel Core i9-13900K CPU Jacob Roach / Digital Trends / Digital Trends

Read more