Skip to main content

Intel’s Sandy Bridge CPUs build in graphics controllers

Chipmaking giant Intel has kicked off its Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco with demonstrations of its “Sandy Bridge” processors, expected to debut in early 2011 and become the next processor family driving mainstream notebook and desktop PCs. Unlike the current Core series, the 32nm Sandy Bridge chips will feature integrated graphics controllers that will share cache and memory with the processors own core, substantially enhancing graphics performance while keeping a low energy use profile. The chips will also feature an improved version of Intel’s Turbo Boost technology that reallocates processor codes and graphics resources to improve performance.

The Sandy Bridge chips will mark the second generation of Intel’s “Core” processor line, which currently features Core i3, i5, and i7 models.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

“The way people and businesses are using computers is evolving at an explosive rate, fueling demand for an even more powerful and visually appealing experience,” said Intel Architecture Group executive VP and general manager Dadi Perlmutter, in a statement. “Our upcoming 2nd Generation Intel Core processor family represents the biggest advance in computing performance and capabilities over any previous generation.’

The integrated graphics controller in the Sandy Bridge processors will be able to handle high-definition and 3D video, graphics-intensive gaming, as well as 3D visualization and rendering tasks. Although those sorts of technologies are readily available on the market now, but integrating them directly into the CPU Intel is essentially shortcutting third-party graphics developers like AMD and Nvidia. With Sandy Bridge, most of the multimedia and graphics capabilities everyday users expect from a reasonable notebook or desktop computer will be built ing, which makes some industry watchers forecast hard times ahead for discrete graphics developers.

Graphics developer Nvidia—which has had an increasingly bitter relationship with Intel in recent years—has downplayed the graphics capabilities of Sandy Bridge, noting that the market for discrete graphics is bigger than ever.

Intel expects Sandy Bridge chips will be in production later this year, and begin appearing on new desktop and notebook PCs in early 2011.

Image used with permission by copyright holder
Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's Core i9-13900K is one of the best processors you can buy. The 24-core behemoth can rip through productivity workloads with ease, and it's easily one of the fastest gaming CPUs money can buy. Even with so much power under the hood, it's not the right choice for everyone.

Supreme power comes at a supreme cost, and for the Core i9-13900K, that comes in the form of heat and power draw. In addition, a recent wave of instability has hit Intel's high-end CPUs like the Core i9-13900K, making alternatives a bit more attractive.

Read more
I’ve used Intel CPUs for years. Here’s why I’m finally switching to AMD
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

I've been using Intel CPUs for close to seven years. It started with the Core i7-8700K, but I moved on to the Core i9-10900K, Core i9-12900K, and most recently, the Core i9-13900K, all of which could have occupied a slot among the best processors at different points in time. But after so much time with Team Blue, I'm switching back to AMD.

It comes at an interesting time for Intel and the PC hardware community as a whole, which is currently abuzz about a particular article claiming that Intel is objectively "better" for PC gamers. That's not what this article is. Instead, I want to walk you through why I chose to use AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D in my gaming PC, and how I came to the decision.
Stability struggles
The Intel Core i9-13900K CPU Jacob Roach / Digital Trends / Digital Trends

Read more
Some Intel CPUs lost 9% of their performance almost overnight
Someone holding the Core i9-12900KS processor.

Over the past few weeks, we've seen an increasing number of reports of instability on high-end Intel CPUs like the Core i9-14900K. Asus has released a BIOS update for its Z790 motherboards aimed at addressing the problem, but it carries a performance loss of upwards of 9% in some workloads.

The most recent BIOS update from Asus includes the Intel Baseline Profile. This profile disables various optimizations that are automatically applied on Asus Z790 motherboards and runs high-end Intel chips within Intel's specific limits. Hardwareluxx tested the new profile with the Core i9-14900K and found that the CPU ran around 9% slower in multiple tests.

Read more