Skip to main content

Microsoft might end one of the most annoying GPU wars

Three RTX 4080 cards sitting on a pink background.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The never-ending battle between AMD, Nvidia, and Intel doesn’t just involve their graphics cards — it also stretches to their respective upscaling solutions. It’s not all about performance, either, but also the number of games that support them. Microsoft aims to streamline and unify these upscalers, making it easier for game devs to add support for every GPU vendor.

The main issue with having three different upscaling solutions lies not just in how well they all perform in relation to each other (although that’s pretty interesting, too), but in how many games can support them. After all, what’s the point in DLSS, FSR, and XeSS, if they’re not available in too many games? This is where Microsoft’s new API, dubbed DirectSR, might come in handy.

Microsoft plans to talk more about the new API during its 2024 Game Developers Conference, but it gave us a little sneak peek in a recent blog post. DirectSR (for Super Resolution) was made to make the integration of upscaling techniques simpler. According to Microsoft, it was created in partnership with GPU vendors.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

“DirectSR is the missing link developers have been waiting for when approaching SR integration, providing a smoother, more efficient experience that scales across hardware,” said Microsoft’s Joshua Tucker in the blog post. “This API enables multi-vendor SR through a common set of inputs and outputs, allowing a single code path to activate a variety of solutions.”

This means that Microsoft isn’t trying to implement its own competitor to Nvidia’s DLSS, AMD’s FSR, and Intel’s XeSS. Instead, it aims to simplify the process of adding support for all three GPU vendors. With DirectSR, devs may no longer have to add separate support for all three upscalers; instead, they could support DirectSR, which will then utilize the upscaling tech available on your system.

Benchmark of the RTX 4070 Super at 4K with DLSS 3 enabled.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

This could give a major boost to all three GPU makers. Each technology works a little differently, in that AMD’s FSR and Intel XeSS work on most modern GPUs, but Nvidia’s DLSS is limited to the GeForce RTX lineup. However, on a game level, the adoption of AMD FSR 3 has been very slow, so this could help AMD speed up the process.

The varying degrees of support for various upscalers have caused their fair share of drama during some recent game releases. Let’s take Starfield, for instance. AMD’s exclusive partnership with Bethesda made it so that the game launched without DLSS 3 support. Needless to say, gamers with Nvidia GPUs weren’t happy, especially considering the fact that DLSS 3 can do a lot in AAA games — just take a look at our benchmark of the RTX 4070 Super above. In the case of Starfield, DLSS 3 was later added by modders and then, eventually, by Bethesda itself. Curiously, the game also only started supporting FSR 3 and XeSS this year.

If Microsoft’s DirectSR works out the way we hope it might, it could help resolve similar conflicts in the future. Game devs could add support for DirectSR and the technology would then handle all the rest. Microsoft will surely tell us more during the DirectX State of the Union presentation on March 21.

Editors' Recommendations

Monica J. White
Monica is a UK-based freelance writer and self-proclaimed geek. A firm believer in the "PC building is just like expensive…
How Intel could win the GPU war this year
Intel Arc A580 graphics card on a pink background.

Intel faced an uphill climb with Arc Alchemist, and it looks like it might have another fight ahead with its next-gen Battlemage GPUs. The competition is always fierce, and AMD and Nvidia have big plans for the year ahead.

Despite the clouds that loom on the horizon, Intel might still surprise us with Battlemage -- in a good way. Here's where Intel Arc Battlemage is currently at, and why it might have a shot at being one of the best GPUs of the year.
Déjà vu
Prior to the release of Intel Arc Alchemist, one of the main complaints was that the general public was kept in the dark a lot of the time. The release date was pushed back more than once, and the information about the GPUs was fairly scarce compared to the constant hype we've all grown used to with Nvidia and AMD leaks.

Read more
I made an entire PC build for the price of one Nvidia GPU
A gaming PC with RGB synced lights running Apex Legends.

Nvidia makes some of the best graphics cards, but most of them are ridiculously expensive. In fact, some of them are so pricey that you could build a whole gaming PC for the price of one GPU. This is where AMD has an edge -- it doesn't just have more affordable graphics cards, but it also makes processors to match.

By choosing AMD, you might be able to get more bang for your buck than if you were to pick an Intel CPU and an Nvidia GPU. So I did it, picking out all the components for a build you could go out and build today for the price of a single GPU.
Why AMD is a better choice

Read more
This AMD GPU could have destroyed Nvidia, but we might never see it
Radeon logo on the RX 7900 XTX.

Rumor has it that AMD may have decided not to launch any high-end GPUs in the next generation of graphics cards, meaning RDNA 4. However, this freshly leaked diagram gives us some insight into what could have been -- or perhaps, what will be -- if AMD's best graphics card of the next generation was made. It appears that AMD's next-gen architecture is a lot more complex than RDNA 3.

The diagram comes from YouTuber Moore's Law is Dead, who, as always, cites his own anonymous sources. It's only a partial diagram, but even that quick look into the architecture of RDNA 4 tells us a lot. While not sure which GPU this is, Moore's Law Is Dead refers to it as Navi 4C, and all signs point to it being AMD's top GPU for the next generation. Still, it's unclear if this new naming convention refers to Navi 41 or perhaps Navi 42, as Navi X and Navi M have also been mentioned recently.

Read more