Skip to main content

Rumor: The Fury Nano beats the R9 290X at half the size and power consumption

rumor the fury nano beats r9 290x at half size and power consumption nano1
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The big chip manufacturers have been having trouble keeping slides under wraps. The latest example is a slide purporting to share performance in frames per second, as well as performance per watt, of the upcoming Radeon R9 Fury Nano. The slides come from a German tech site called Golem, using Far Cry 4 as a benchmark.

If the information in the slide is to be believed, and the misspelling of “Performance” in the title means we should take them with a grain of salt, the R9 Fury Nano barely nudges out the 290X, but comes in well behind the water-cooled Fury X. On AMD’s test system, the 290x managed just over 30 frames per second, while the Fury Nano landed around 34. The Fury X blew past both of them, averaging 42 frames per second, but what’s more impressive is the power usage.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

In terms of performance per watt, the graph looks quite a bit different. The Fury Nano is clearly the most power efficient of the cards, partially thanks to its 175W TDP, powered by a single 8-pin PCIe power connector. Of course, the way AMD is measuring performance per watt is by using the memory bandwidth per watt of power consumed, and that’s not a very fair fight, and the reason for that is HMB.

AMD’s new High Bandwidth Memory, or HBM, is a replacement for the GDDR5 memory that the 290X uses. This new memory layout stacks cells vertically, so the effective bandwidth of the memory is faster, and more power efficient, several times over. It’s still exciting to see that power usage is so much lower, but the graph is much more dramatic as a result of this newer memory architecture.

Radeon-R9-Nano-Hot-Chips-2015-02
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Unfortunately, there’s no way of knowing yet if these slides are true, or if they are true, if they accurately reflect real world performance or power usage on the R9 Fury Nano. The newest from AMD packs some appealing features into a small package, but without real benchmarks or confirmed data, it’s a bit early to get excited.

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
A dangerous new jailbreak for AI chatbots was just discovered
the side of a Microsoft building

Microsoft has released more details about a troubling new generative AI jailbreak technique it has discovered, called "Skeleton Key." Using this prompt injection method, malicious users can effectively bypass a chatbot's safety guardrails, the security features that keeps ChatGPT from going full Taye.

Skeleton Key is an example of a prompt injection or prompt engineering attack. It's a multi-turn strategy designed to essentially convince an AI model to ignore its ingrained safety guardrails, "[causing] the system to violate its operators’ policies, make decisions unduly influenced by a user, or execute malicious instructions," Mark Russinovich, CTO of Microsoft Azure, wrote in the announcement.

Read more