Skip to main content

Twitter Says No To Third-party Ads

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Popular micro-blogging and social networking service Twitter has been looking at ways to earn real money from its widely-adopted platform, including selling real-time feeds of Twitter’s traffic to search engines and working on a “Promoted Tweets” system that will put paid-for tweets in Twitter search results. But now Twitter is also drawing a line in the sand: it’s barring third-party advertisements on the site in a move to “preserve the integrity and relevance” of timelines.

“Aside from Promoted Tweets, we will not allow any third party to inject paid tweets into a timeline on any service that leverages the Twitter API,” wrote Twitter’s COO Dick Costolo, in a blog post. “We are updating our Terms of Service to articulate clearly what we mean by this statement, and we encourage you to read the updated API Terms of Service to be released shortly.”

Costolo says that Twitter isn’t trying to control what people tweet via the service, and that the company believes there are ways to sell ads and built applications on top of Twitter’s service—such as Twitter clients that sell real-time ads around Twitter feeds. However, the Terms of Service for developers specifically prohibit placing advertisements in the Twitter timeline. Services that don’t generate revenue or that make money in ways other than advertising will apparently not be impacted by the change.

Although it’s tempting to say that Twitter’s new policy on third-party ads is all about drawing attention to its own (so far very limited) Promoted Tweets service, the reality is probably a little more complex. Twitter’s strength is its simplicity—it’s just a sequence of 140-character updates from a selected group of users or accounts someone might care about. Compared to a full blown Web site, that’s an incredibly fragile set of content that could easily be disrupted and reduced to irrelevance if it were contaminated with advertising. Twitter may actually be looking out for its users…and its own long-term health.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Capcom says Dragon’s Dogma 2 will ‘overwhelm’ your CPU
An archer fires an arrow at an enemy in Dragon's Dogma 2.

Dragon's Dogma 2 is finally here, and it may be a doozy for your PC.

The game is powered by Capcom's Reach for the Moon (RE) Engine, used in titles like Resident Evil Village and Monster Hunter Rise. Dragon's Dogma 2 presents a seamless gaming experience without loading screens once you dive into the game. However, this level of immersion comes with demanding hardware requirements, particularly on the CPU front.

Read more
New report says GPT-5 is coming this summer and is ‘materially better’
A laptop screen shows the home page for ChatGPT, OpenAI's artificial intelligence chatbot.

GPT-5, OpenAI's next large language model (LLM), is in the pipeline and should be launched within months, people close to the matter told Business Insider. 

Two anonymous sources told the publication that GPT-5 may be set to release during the summer and that OpenAI is currently sending demos of the technology, as well as updates to the accompanying ChatGPT chatbot, to its enterprise customers for testing. 

Read more
Nvidia is the ‘GPU cartel,’ says former AMD Radeon manager
A hand holding the RTX 4090 GPU.

AMD's former senior vice president and general manager of Radeon has come out with some strong words against Nvidia. Scott Herkelman called Nvidia "the GPU cartel" in response to a story from the Wall Street Journal in which Nvidia's customers claim that it delays GPU shipments in retaliation for those customers shopping with other suppliers.

The accusation in question comes from Jonathan Ross, CEO of AI chip startup Groq, who said, "a lot of people that we meet with say that if Nvidia were to hear that we were meeting, they would disavow it. The problem is you have to pay Nvidia a year in advance, and you may get your hardware in a year, or it may take longer, and it's, 'Aw shucks, you're buying from someone else, and I guess it's going to take a little longer.'"

Read more