Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. News

Is Netflix planning to compete with live TV?

By

Unless you’re brand new to the streaming world, there’s one thing everyone knows about Netflix: It’s an on-demand service. There are no channels or scheduled guides, and no live coverage of events. But that might soon change. The streaming giant has just launched a new feature called Direct as a trial available only in France. Direct is a live TV streaming channel with a prepopulated schedule of Netflix content. You simply fire it up and start watching.

Netflix Direct
Netflix

Technically, Direct isn’t live TV — the shows that are streamed via Direct are being pulled from the same catalog of content that French Netflix subscribers have always had access to. It’s the video-streaming equivalent of a radio station on Apple Music or Sonos Radio, but with the benefit of being able to see what’s coming up next in the playlist. And just like radio stations, there’s no way to skip forward or back with Direct; you join the stream in progress and let it wash over you.

The radio station analogy fits another aspect of Direct. Unlike the many curated recommendations Netflix users get based on their personal viewing habits, Direct is the same experience for everyone who tunes in.

Direct began rolling out in France on November 5, and Netflix expects to make it available across that country by the end of the month. At the moment, it’s a web-only feature — you can’t access Direct via a smart TV app, a streaming device, or a smartphone app — which suggests that Netflix is using this period to test Direct’s popularity.

If Direct proves successful, it could signal the start of a new chapter in Netflix’s evolution. The company has been a mainstay of the cord-cutting community for years, but it has never attempted to provide a true cable substitute such as Hulu + Live TV, Sling TV, or YouTube TV.

Could Netflix create its own version of these services, acting as yet another carrier for the big TV power brokers like Disney, NBCUniversal, and ViacomCBS? No question about it: It has the money, the audience, and the infrastructure to do so. The real question is, does it want to?

Why compete for live TV?

Netflix has proven that it can attract and maintain a massive subscription audience that shows up more and more to watch original productions. From a pure content creation point of view, Netflix is already a TV powerhouse that can rival those other entities. It doesn’t need to create a carbon copy of existing live TV streaming services to survive — but the company might need to adjust its current approach to releasing content.

We’re already witnessing the start of streaming services taking refuge in the traditional weekly release of episodes as a way to stop people signing up, bingeing, then canceling. Disney+‘s Mandalorian has become the poster child for this approach.

Taken to its logical next step, new episodes of streaming shows wouldn’t just show up at a preordained time and day, they would show up first on Direct. Only after that “live” debut would they be made available on-demand, perhaps as much as 24 hours later.

Direct was launched in France because in that country, according to Netflix, “traditional TV consumption is very popular, [and] many viewers like the idea of ​​programming that avoids having to choose what to watch.”

My guess is that tendency to want programmed entertainment is strong elsewhere, too. It explains the huge success of YouTube’s recommended video algorithms, and why, despite the abundance of incredible on-demand options, services like YouTube TV continue to grow.

So Direct may not signal Netflix’s intention to get into the traditional space of live TV streaming as others have done, but it’s the first real evidence we have that it’s willing to disrupt its own tried-and-true on-demand model, even if that means taking a page out of traditional TV’s playbook. And once those floodgates are open, you can bet we’ll start to see an increasing number of experiments as Netflix figures out how to contend with the onslaught of TV’s biggest players into the space that it single-handedly created.

Must-see TV is being upended, in other words. To see where it lands, tune in next week.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Simon Cohen
Simon Cohen
Contributing Editor, A/V
Simon Cohen covers a variety of consumer technologies, but has a special interest in audio and video products, like spatial…
Netflix reveals that its ad tier is proving mighty popular
The Netflix logo is displayed on a TV screen while red lights illuminate the wall behind.

Netflix’s ad-supported tier, which launched in 2022, is proving a big hit with subscribers.

The streaming giant revealed on Wednesday that its ad tier has grown to 40 million monthly users globally, which is a significant chunk of its 270 million members. It took the ad plan six months to reach 5 million users before growing to 23 million subscribers in January.

Read more
Sling TV slips below 2 million subscribers, and it seems OK with that
Sling TV logo on Apple TV.

There’s a fallacy in the term “Streaming Wars” — a phrase I’ve never liked — in that it’s all about growth at all costs. That the only way to “win” said “war” is to be the biggest streaming service. That’s the game we’ve been taught by the likes of the Googles and Facebooks of the world, and it’s undoubtedly a big part of why Google’s YouTube TV sits atop the heap of live-streaming services with more than 8 million subscribers.

Then there’s Sling TV. The legacy service has been slowly, but consistently losing subscribers over the years, while always hovering at just above 2 million. That’s changed, though, according to its first-quarter 2024 earnings, which were announced by new parent company EchoStar. Sling TV finished with 1.92 million subs, down from 2.06 million at the end of 2023, and down about 8.5% from the first quarter of 2023. It hasn't been below 2 million since I started tracking it in 2018.

Read more
You can finally order Walmart’s $50 Chromecast with Google TV killer
Onn 4K Pro Streaming Device box.

The Onn 4K Pro Streaming Device has an unassuming name and very tempting price. Walmart

Google I/O is just around the corner. But for all the new Googley goodness we expect -- and a ton of that's going to include the letters A and I -- one thing we're not planning on seeing is a successor to the venerable-but-aging Chromecast with Google TV. That's why this $50 box from Walmart's in-house Onn brand has had folks excited. Because in addition to just being ... not new -- the current Chromecast basically is four years old -- it's always been pretty underpowered for what it does.

Read more