Skip to main content

United States Supreme Court to hear the Aereo vs. Broadcasters case

Aereo devices
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Detailed by Bloomberg yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court plans to hear an appeal led by representatives of broadcasters like CBS, ABC and FOX against streaming media company Aereo. The group of broadcasters has been in this legal struggle for nearly two years at this point, but the broadcasters have been trounced by Aereo in the courts nearly every step of the way. The broadcasters have constantly stuck to the claim that the retransmission of network signals without paying retransmission fees is a violation of copyright law. 

Aereo claims that paying retransmission fees isn’t necessary since the company installs an antenna that receives free, high definition, over-the-air broadcast signals for every single customer that signs up for the monthly subscription service. Available in multiple major U.S. markets along the East Coast and within the Midwest, customers pay between $8 to $12 a month to access to the signals and receive 20 to 60 hours of DVR space for recording live programming. The most expensive plan also allows users to record two shows at once, similar to a standard two-tuner DVR in a typical cable box. 

Watching Aereo before Supreme Court battle
Image used with permission by copyright holder

According to a statement released by Aereo yesterday, company representatives are looking forward to a final resolution to the lawsuit. Specifically, CEO Chet Kanojia said “We look forward to presenting our case to the Supreme Court and we have every confidence that the Court will validate and preserve a consumer’s right to access local over-the-air television with an individual antenna, make a personal recording with a DVR, and watch that recording on a device of their choice.”

Interestingly, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that’s favorable to Aereo could pave the way for expansion in the western portion of the United States. Up to this point, Aereo has only ventured as far west as Salt Lake City, Utah to expand the service area. This is due to a Ninth Circuit court ruling that ruled against the legality of a service similar to Aereo, basically opposite of the Second Circuit court ruling in New York. The Ninth Circuit ruling covers nine states that include Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.  

Aereo-CEO-interview-header-2
Image used with permission by copyright holder

At this point, there’s no indication of the timing of the hearing or when the Supreme Court will actually rule on the appeal. However, it’s possible that Aereo will gain a favorable decision since the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided against hearing the broadcaster’s appeal last year.

That being said, representatives of ABC and NBC released a joint statement that read “We are gratified that the Supreme Court has granted our petition to review issues that both sides recognize as significant.” The CBS statement was slightly more incendiary and read “We believe that Aereo’s business model, and similar offerings that operate on the same principle, are built on stealing the creative content of others.”

If the U.S. Supreme Court rules against the broadcasters, it’s possible that each network will consider transitioning exclusively to a cable channel and halt all free over-the-air transmissions. This could be a prudent course of action since DirecTV, Time Warner Cable and Charter Communications are all considering the same legal loophole in order to get away from paying hefty retransmission fees. Hypothetically, these companies could quickly set up similar antenna farms and simply retransmit the free over-the-air signals to all paying subscribers. 

Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
The Beats Pill is back, baby!
A pair of Beats Pill speakers.

In what's been one of the worst-kept secrets of the year -- mostly because subtly putting a product into the hands of some of the biggest stars on the planet is no way to keep a secret -- the Beats Pill has returned. Just a couple of years after Apple and Beats unceremoniously killed off the stylish Bluetooth speaker, a new one has arrived.

Available for preorder today in either black, red, or gold, the $150 speaker (and speakerphone, for that matter) rounds out a 2024 release cycle for beats that includes the Solo Buds and Solo 4 headphones, and comes nearly a year after the Beats Studio Pro.

Read more
Ifi’s latest DAC is the first to add lossless Bluetooth audio
Ifi Audio Zen Blue 3 DAC (front).

Ifi Audio's new Zen Blue 3 wireless digital-to-analog converter (DAC) will officially be available to buy for $299 on July 9. When it is, it will be the first device of its kind to support a wide variety of Bluetooth codecs, including Qualcomm's aptX Lossless, the only codec that claims to deliver bit-perfect CD quality audio over a Bluetooth connection.

Admittedly, there are very few devices on the market that can receive aptX Lossless (and fewer that can transmit it), so it's a good thing that the Zen Blue 3 also works with the more widely supported aptX Adaptive, LDAC, and LDHC/HWA codecs (all of which are hi-res audio-capable), plus the three most common codecs: AAC, SBC, and aptX.

Read more
The new Beats Pill might replace Sonos on my back porch
The 2024 Beats Pill and an aging Sonos Play:1.

If I were to build an outdoor stereo in 2024, I'd do it with a pair of portable Beats Pills instead of Sonos speakers. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

In 2017, after more than a decade in our home, my wife and I added a pool. With it came a covered deck, making what basically was a new outdoor room. Not uncommon at all in Florida, but new to us.

Read more