Skip to main content

Verizon to Netflix: Slow video streams are your fault [Update: Verizon slips again in June]

The toxic public debate between Netflix and Verizon over who’s to blame for the slow streaming video Verizon’s customers endure on its networks is starting to get a little ridiculous. And the worst part is, we still don’t know who’s lying and who’s telling the truth. Increasingly, it’s beginning to appear that on either side of the equation, it’s a mix of both. The latest in the he-said/she-said saga between the quarreling companies comes from a blog post Verizon published on Thursday, which claims Netflix is the sole cause of Verizon’s streaming woes. But that’s really just the tip of the tale.

Updated 7/14/2014: Netflix released its Speed Index Report for June today, which once again showed Verizon’s FiOS service slipping in the rankings, down another two spots from May. The latest report puts Verizon’s flagship service at a dismal 12th place in the top 16 ranked ISPs, down 17 percent from 1.9 Mbps in May to 1.59 Mbps in June. The news comes just a few days after Verizon’s condemnation, and adds more heat to the broiling debate between the two companies.

Verizon points the finger

In the blog post, Verizon’s vice president of federal regulatory affairs, David Young, claims that the telecom giant recently completed a review spawned by a letter from a Verizon customer in Los Angeles, who complained that Verizon was throttling his Netflix streams.

Channeling John McCain’s “Joe the plumber” monologue, Young claims this single letter spawned a full review of the customer’s network connection, finding “no congestion anywhere within the Verizon network.” Further, Young claims that its review found “congestion at the interconnection link…used by the transit providers chosen by Netflix to deliver video traffic to Verizon’s network.” In other words, Verizon is claiming quantifiable proof that Netflix is to blame by not keeping up with its transit duties when it comes to supplying video streams to ISPs, using insufficient third-party transit.

Young goes on to argue that a deliberate choice was made by Netflix to deliver its downstream traffic through insufficient means, which are unable to handle the service’s massive traffic streams, which now amount to over 1/3 of all downstream traffic in North America during peak hours.

“For whatever reason (perhaps to cut costs and improve its profitability), Netflix did not make arrangements to deliver this massive amount of traffic through connections that can handle it,” Young writes. “Instead, Netflix chose to attempt to deliver that traffic to Verizon through a few third-party transit providers with limited capacity over connections specifically to be used only for balanced traffic flows. Netflix knew better.”

Indeed, Netflix did know better.

Open Connect

Young’s tack is an interesting one here, considering that Netflix created its own content delivery system, Open Connect, long ago to remedy streaming issues, which Verizon refused to use. Open Connect is essentially a direct connection to Netflix servers that is designed to circumvent the same kinds of third-party transit providers for which Young condemns Netflix for using. Other ISPs who do subscribe to Open Connect, such as Cablevision, rank at the top of the Netflix Speed Index charts.

Still, on the other side of the coin, a recent report from Light Reading claims that Netflix may not be the white knight it paints itself to be. The report outlines claims from Peter Sevcik, an engineer with “decades of Internet experience” who says that the so-called “last mile,” the point at which traffic connects to ISPs, can’t be to blame for streaming issues. Sevcik claims Netflix streaming only takes about 2 Mbps in the last mile, and most ISPs are delivering much more bandwidth than that.

The report seems to support Verizon’s claims that Netflix’s third-party delivery system is simply too congested, and further, that Netflix could purchase more transit to alleviate the issue if it so desired. But Netflix wants to stop giving its money to third-party transit systems, and instead build out its Open Connect system. 

Deal? What deal?

But what about Netflix and Verizon’s deal for faster connection? Not long ago, the two companies made a very public, and very controversial pay-for-speed deal, which was designed to allay the very streaming issues in question. The deal also helped feed the flames of today’s debates about network neutrality, as flocks of consumer advocates argue that such deals could lead to an unfair class system online that favors the rich and powerful.

However, neutrality issues aside, not long after the deal, Verizon began to dip in the speed rankings (see Index chart again), instead of improve. The issue spurred Netflix to begin posting public messages for Verizon customers experiencing buffer issues that read “The Verizon network is crowded right now.” That message did not make Verizon happy and, in fact, sparked a cease and desist order from Verizon’s legal team, as well as general public sparring that helped lead to Thursday’s blog post, and the continued back-and-forth spat.

Regardless of who you believe, we have no doubt there is much more to the story than what’s available to us, the confounded public. In any case, Netflix will almost assuredly respond soon, so we’ll keep you abreast of the situation as it develops. Your move, Mr. Hastings.

Ryan Waniata
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Waniata is a multi-year veteran of the digital media industry, a lover of all things tech, audio, and TV, and a…
The Beats Pill is back, baby!
A pair of Beats Pill speakers.

In what's been one of the worst-kept secrets of the year -- mostly because subtly putting a product into the hands of some of the biggest stars on the planet is no way to keep a secret -- the Beats Pill has returned. Just a couple of years after Apple and Beats unceremoniously killed off the stylish Bluetooth speaker, a new one has arrived.

Available for preorder today in either black, red, or gold, the $150 speaker (and speakerphone, for that matter) rounds out a 2024 release cycle for beats that includes the Solo Buds and Solo 4 headphones, and comes nearly a year after the Beats Studio Pro.

Read more
Ifi’s latest DAC is the first to add lossless Bluetooth audio
Ifi Audio Zen Blue 3 DAC (front).

Ifi Audio's new Zen Blue 3 wireless digital-to-analog converter (DAC) will officially be available to buy for $299 on July 9. When it is, it will be the first device of its kind to support a wide variety of Bluetooth codecs, including Qualcomm's aptX Lossless, the only codec that claims to deliver bit-perfect CD quality audio over a Bluetooth connection.

Admittedly, there are very few devices on the market that can receive aptX Lossless (and fewer that can transmit it), so it's a good thing that the Zen Blue 3 also works with the more widely supported aptX Adaptive, LDAC, and LDHC/HWA codecs (all of which are hi-res audio-capable), plus the three most common codecs: AAC, SBC, and aptX.

Read more
The new Beats Pill might replace Sonos on my back porch
The 2024 Beats Pill and an aging Sonos Play:1.

If I were to build an outdoor stereo in 2024, I'd do it with a pair of portable Beats Pills instead of Sonos speakers. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

In 2017, after more than a decade in our home, my wife and I added a pool. With it came a covered deck, making what basically was a new outdoor room. Not uncommon at all in Florida, but new to us.

Read more