Skip to main content

Why I still won’t wear wireless headphones

Klipsch X20i in-ear headphones Klipsch

An annoying thing happened this morning on my commute into Manhattan. I was squeezed — no, mashed — against the door of the G train as a large man with an equally large shoulder bag slid past me. As he passed, something on his shoulder bag hooked my beloved in-ear Klipsch X20i headphones, ripping their double-flanged silicone tips from the depths of my ear canals.

It was a painful quantum shift: One moment I was blissfully soaked in the sounds of Alvvays (yeah, I’m an old hipster) and the next my ears were searing from reverse-pressure pops, turned into New York City subway noise, spiced by the aggravation of it all, with a small dose of concern for my expensive gadget.

I see the allure of wireless headphones quite clearly. They’re compact. There’s nothing to snag. 

I told this story to a co-worker who blithely asked me why I was still using wired headphones to begin with. After all, he pointed out, I had the iPhone X which didn’t even have a headphone port. Was I really using that goofy adapter just to use my old-world 3.5mm headphones? Was I really unable to charge my iPhone X while listening to music? Was I really stuck in 2016?

It was a fair question, and not one I was entirely prepared to answer, outside of the fact that I just really like my Klipsches and they cost me a lot.

I can see the allure of wireless headphones quite clearly. In fact, they tick almost all of my nerdy-need boxes. They’re compact. There’s nothing to snag. Without a wire hanging from my ears, not only would I avoid the ear-canal-ripping abuse I so often deal with on my commutes, but going to the gym would be equally pleasant. And on a plane I’d be able to just leave my iPhone in the seat-back pocket without worrying about the wires either for my tray table or for that guy sitting next to me who has a bladder the size of an AirPod.

Beats Powerbeats3 Wireless
Beats Powerbeats3 Wireless Image used with permission by copyright holder

I had given banded Bluetooth headphone a try, some of which offer amazing charge times to the point that power anxiety becomes a moot issue. Phiaton’s BT 150 NC, for instance, run for a full 12 to 20 hours on one charge.

But I found those uncomfortable: heavy in comparison to my in-ears and, in many ways, just as cumbersome as fully wired headphones.

Other wireless earbuds of quality, like Bragi’s The Headphone, have failed to gain retail traction.

Others appear to agree with me, if sales data from Best Buy is any indication. The best-selling banded earphones at Best Buy, the PowerBeats Wireless, offer 12 hours of battery life and running-friendly ear hooks. But despite their relative popularity, the Beats have struggled to be a top-100 seller.

But it seems truly wireless earbuds are catching on. That is, as long as they’re made by Apple and called AirPods. According to sales-rank data from Best Buy, Apple’s AirPods are regularly a top-five seller across all products, including laptops and even Geek Squad services. In fact, the AirPods are now a best-seller at both Best Buy and Amazon.

It’s a curious thing, too: Despite the AirPods’ popularity, other wireless earbuds of quality, like Bragi’s The Headphone, have failed to gain retail traction. Despite great reviews, The Headphone is already on clearance for just $99 at Best Buy, and has failed to pick up any momentum when it comes to sales rank, as shown below.

Another true wireless earbud set from consumer-electronics giant Sony has also failed to grab wireless fans’ attention. The WF-SP700N offer sports-friendly clips, but with a higher price point ($179) and poor battery life, they too have failed to get near Apple’s AirPods.

It seems that, at least for now, the AirPod’s relatively decent battery life combined with simple brand recognition is working well for Apple, as other manufacturers scramble to take a piece of this growing slice of the headphone pie.

This probably won’t always be the case. Because, let’s face it: The future is wireless headphones whether we like it or not. Now that Apple has a best-seller with its true-wireless AirPods, other manufacturers are likely to go after that final pain point: battery time.

Right behind those AirPods at Best Buy’s sale ranking charts is Apple’s lightning-to-3.5mm adapter for those who still want to use standard headphones.

In fact, recent developments in Bluetooth chip technology means that future earbuds will be much less energy-hungry. When someone comes out with earbuds that will run for an entire day — or days — on a single charge, you can pretty much bet that people like me will give them a second look.

For now, though, the data shows that I’m not alone in holding out with wired headphones. Right behind those AirPods at Best Buy’s sale ranking charts is Apple’s lightning-to-3.5mm adapter for those who still want to use standard headphones. In fact, it’s been a top-20 seller at Best Buy since the iPhone 7 was released sans-headphone jack.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Maybe I’ll change my mind one day. Maybe when my trusty Klipsches finally bite the bullet and maybe once Apple (or someone else) finally releases a wireless charger that makes keeping things juiced up a lot more convenient I’ll take the leap into wireless headphones. Maybe they’re as good as their aficionados say they are.

But until that day, I’m wired.

Joshua Fruhlinger
Writer, editor, content strategist, thinkish. You may have seen me at Engadget, Wall Street Journal, GQ, Made Man, or at a…
Apple has upgraded the AirPods Pro with lossless audio, sort of
Apple AirPods Pro with USB-C.

Amid the slew of new Apple products launched today, only the tiniest mention was made of the fact that Apple has also given the AirPods Pro Gen 2 wireless earbuds a not-so-minor refresh. Along with the expected addition of USB-C, making the AirPods Pro the first Apple headphones to ditch the Lightning connector, Apple has also given the iconic white noise-canceling earbuds the ability to do lossless audio wirelessly -- something that has never been seen on the AirPods family before, and is even a rarity among non-Apple wireless audio devices.

There is, however, a catch. The "groundbreaking wireless audio protocol" that allows for lossless audio at 20-bit/48 kHz (a better-than-CD-quality resolution) is powered by the AirPods Pro's H2 chip, but for now, it only works when paired with the upcoming Apple Vision Pro headset. At the moment, Qualcomm's aptX Lossless Bluetooth codec (when used with compatible wireless headphones and smartphones) is the only technology that supports lossless audio wirelessly, and even that technology is limited to 16-bit/48kHz.

Read more
Bluetooth headphones have been on planes for 10 years, so why do I still need a cable?
sony noise cancelling headphones whc700n amazon deal wireless bluetooth over the ear  wh ch700n

United Airlines passengers are about to get a big upgrade to their in-flight entertainment (IFE) experience over the coming years thanks to its purchase of 300,000 IFE systems from Panasonic Avionics. The new seatback systems are wildly better than what we’ve been used to, sporting large and colorful 4K OLED screens, USB-C charging ports, spatial audio support — and a feature that seems almost old-fashioned by comparison: you can connect your Bluetooth wireless headphones.

United’s upgraded Boeing 787 and Airbus A321XLR aircraft won’t be its first planes with Bluetooth, but the fact that it's a feature the airline felt was worth calling out is a stark reminder that Bluetooth -- a wireless audio technology that has been around for about 25 years -- remains a rarity on airplanes. This is despite the fact that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) got over its long-running fear of the tech in 2013 when it overturned its previous rules about portable device use and effectively gave airlines the green light on going blue.

Read more
Amazon’s new $50 Echo Buds take aim at Apple’s AirPods
Amazon's new Echo Buds for 2023.

Amazon is back with a new set of Echo Buds. Though they bear the same name as the first- and second-gen Echo Buds, these new Echo Buds offer an entirely different, semi-in-ear, stem-based design that has more in common with Apple's second-gen AirPods than it does with Amazon's previous designs. The latest Echo Buds are also surprisingly affordable at just $50.

While the decision to keep the name the same may be confusing, the decision to create a set of wireless earbuds with a semi-in-ear shape makes a lot of sense. Fully in-ear buds like the second-gen Echo Buds, the AirPods Pro, and Sony's WF-1000XM4, provide distinct advantages for sound quality and they also set the stage for active noise canceling (ANC). However, lots of people find these earbuds uncomfortable to wear. The silicone tips increase the sensation of having an object wedged in your ear, and some folks complain of a sucking feeling, especially when ANC is turned on.

Read more