Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Apple Fitness Plus Review: Rough around the edges, but has potential

apple fitness plus review screenshot trainers3
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Apple Fitness Plus
MSRP $10.00
“Fitness+ motivates you to close your activity rings, but is lacking in key areas”
Pros
  • Seamless integration with the Apple Watch
  • Diversity of likable trainers
  • Variety of workout types
  • New content every week
Cons
  • Requires an Apple Watch Series 3 or newer and an iPhone
  • No live classes
  • Some exercises require specific equipment

Because of gym restrictions and pandemic concerns, many people are building their own home gym instead of dropping their hard-earned money on a gym membership. Services like Apple Fitness+ are stepping in to fill this void as the shift to at-home fitness transforms the fitness industry. Can an online stream replace your in-person Pilates class? We tested Apple Fitness+ to find out.

Apple Watch is the killer feature

Apple Fitness+ is available for the iPad, iPhone, and Apple TV, but it really was designed for the Apple Watch. As soon as you open a workout on your iPhone, it immediately shows up on the Apple Watch. Your watch then sends your health data to your connected device so you can view it as you follow the trainer’s lead.

I found myself connecting with the trainers and wanting to exercise with them.

While you are exercising, you can watch your activity rings increase as you get closer to completing your workout goals. You also can see your heart rate, time, and calories burned. It’s a small feature, but incredibly motivating to see all your stats on the big screen. Because it’s on your screen, you don’t have to keep glancing down at your Watch. This is huge for someone like me who is likely to stumble or lose the rhythm by looking at my wrist.

Can’t-do vibe

Apple Fitness+ is excellent for beginner to midlevel athletes, just as long as they have the right gear. Most cardio workouts require a treadmill, bike, or stepper machine, and they are not interchangeable. Unlike iFit, which films landscape-based activities suitable for any machine, Fitness+ requires you to have a bike to do the cycling workouts, for example.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

You’ll also need dumbbells or kettlebells to complete many of the strength activities. You may be able to swap out bodyweight exercises, but it is not the same. You also can skip those workouts that require specific gear, but eliminating so many exercises considerably diminished my experience. Instead of having a “can-do” feeling, I often had a “can’t-do” feeling as I browsed through the workout library. To be fair, Apple does offer walking workouts and dance classes that don’t require any special gear, but these are few and far between. I would love to see more of this creative, gear-free content.

This “can’t-do” feeling was exacerbated by a limited user interface. Fitness+ sorts the workouts into broad categories (high-intensity interval training, yoga, core, strength, treadmill, cycling, rowing, dance, and mindful cooldown) to help you find the right exercise. ut once inside a category, I found it challenging to find the right workout for my fitness level. There was no way to filter activities based on the difficulty level or gear it required. I had to choose a workout and then read the description to figure out if it was appropriate for me. This hunt-and-peck method of finding an activity was tedious.

Diverse, enthusiastic trainers

Apple is the master of appearance, so it’s no surprise that the Fitness+ videos are highly polished. The videos are filmed in a gorgeous studio gym with great camera angles so you can see exactly how the trainer is moving. The workouts offer upbeat music and likable trainers who encourage you to “close those rings.”

There is no way to filter activities and the hunt-and-peck method of finding a workout was tedious.

Apple’s trainers reflect a variety of different ethnicities, ages, and body types, which I appreciated. Because they were normal and not super-fit elite athletes, I found myself connecting with the trainers and wanting to exercise with them. Their enthusiasm was infectious. Apple also adds content weekly, which keeps me coming back to find out what’s new.

Moderate workouts, but no live content

Fitness+ is geared toward the massive number of iPhone and Apple Watch owners.  It targets the beginner-to-midlevel person and not advanced athletes. Established fitness fanatics could use Fitness+ to supplement their existing routine or for cross-training on a rest day, but it won’t replace their existing high-intensity routine.

Most workouts are simple to follow and some are even scalable, which is a feature other exercise programs should adopt. In these scalable strength workouts, you can choose to complete the selected activities, pump it up a notch with advanced activities, or scale down the exercises if you have an injury or just want to take it easy. This flexibility encourages you to keep going even when an injury or an illness gets in the way.

As much as I enjoyed Fitness+, the service has a major Achilles’ heel. Unlike Peloton or Mirror, which offer an abundance of live classes, Apple Fitness+, unfortunately, is comprised entirely of prerecorded videos. On-demand workouts are convenient because you can exercise anytime you want, but they lack the communal feel of a live class. Hopefully, Apple will bring on a few trainers to lead live classes on a daily basis.

Cost

Apple Fitness + requires an Apple Watch Series 3 or newer, which will set you back at least $199 for a new Watch. It also requires a $10 monthly or a $80 yearly subscription. The service is also included in the Apple One Premier bundle, which costs $30 per month and includes Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Cloud, and News+.  When it comes to cost, it’s significantly cheaper than the average $40 per month subscription that most connected home gyms like Mirror, Tempo Studio, and Tonal require.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Our take

Apple Fitness+ is a great workout tool for the beginner to midlevel Apple fan who already owns an Apple Watch. A growing library of workouts from motivating trainers encourages you to exercise. It’s a little rough around the edges, but it has potential. If Apple listens to its critics and improves the service, Fitness+ could give Peloton a run for its money in the coming year.

Is there a better alternative?

Apple Fitness+ shows promise, but it requires an Apple Watch. Not everyone owns an Apple Watch, nor wants to buy one just to workout. The strongest competitor to Fitness+ is iFit, which has an extensive library of prerecorded studio and outdoor activities and a growing number of live workouts, and does not require a fitness watch. It’s competitively priced at $10 monthly and runs on tablet or smartphone.

How long will it last?

Apple has a history of supporting and upgrading the software on its older devices, and we expect Apple Fitness+ to receive the same treatment. The service will improve over time, and its deficiencies (no live workouts, for example) will be a thing of the past.

Should you buy it?

Yes, Apple Fitness+ may be just what the doctor ordered for Apple Watch owners looking to get fit and stay fit.

Kelly Hodgkins
Kelly's been writing online for ten years, working at Gizmodo, TUAW, and BGR among others. Living near the White Mountains of…
The Apple Watch has already saved someone’s life this year
Crash Detection mode on the Apple Watch SE 2.

Natalie Nasatka was feeling disoriented, but she didn't know that she was suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning. Fortunately, she was able to use the SOS feature on her Apple Watch before losing consciousness. The feature automatically dialed 911 and alerted emergency services, who were able to respond in time to save her life.

Called the silent killer because it has no color, odor, or taste, carbon monoxide sends 50,000 Americans to the emergency room and claims 400 lives each year.

Read more
Apple has an iPad shocker planned for early 2024
A 2021 iPad Pro is attached to a keyboard on a desk.

The promised one is barely a few months away. We’ve been hearing rumors of an OLED iPad Pro for the past few years, but early in 2024, Apple will give finally its premium tablet the screen upgrade we’ve all been waiting anxiously for.

According to Bloomberg, the iPad Pro 2024 will offer an OLED screen and the natural silicon upgrade to the M3 generation. Currently under development under the code names J717, J718, J720, and J721, these new iPads will have 13-inch or 11-inch form factors.
Plenty of iPad Pro upgrades

Read more
Here’s our first look at OnePlus’ next Apple Watch killer
Leaked render of OnePlus Watch 2.

OnePlus’ first attempt at making a smartwatch was mostly a meh attempt, even though it looked extremely sleek. The biggest drawback, of course, was the software. It was essentially a bare-bones software reskinning atop a very basic real-time operating system (RTOS) foundation.
Put simply, it was a not an app-loving operating system and was far away from the deep functional goodness that the likes of Google’s Wear OS and Apple’s watchOS have to offer. The second attempt, which just surfaced online, could atone for those sins.
Leaker OnLeaks (via MySmartPrice) has shared alleged renders of the second-generation OnePlus Watch. Instead of mimicking what Samsung and Fossil have done with their smartwatches, OnePlus seems to be chasing an original design that blends a round dial and a flattened right edge reminiscent of Casio’s G-Shock series timepieces.

The metallic arms extend a little further from the main frame compared to what we’ve seen on Samsung’s recent Galaxy Watches. It’s a subjective aesthetic deviation, but from the top, it seems the arms could offer a more secure grip on the strap attachments.
But the juiciest elements of the latest leak are the chip inside and the software shift it could bring to the table. OnePlus will reportedly go for the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 chip, a wearable platform that is a familiar name in the Wear OS territory. 
The leaked report doesn’t explicitly go into the details of a OnePlus-ified Wear OS experience on the smartwatch, but that Qualcomm chip is a little too overpowered for RTOS, so there’s that. There's also a separate report from leaker Max Jambor, who claims that the OnePlus Watch 2 will indeed be powered by Wear OS — specifically, Wear OS 4.
https://twitter.com/MaxJmb/status/1723031095896076776?s=20
Embracing Wear OS not only saves OnePlus the trouble of managing an entirely custom software experience on its own — it also adds a whole dimension of convenience for users. The biggest and most notable advantage would be the availability of apps and seamless cross-device linking with Android phones.

Read more