Skip to main content

Feds sue AT&T over $16 million collected from fraudulent charges

att-corporate
Image used with permission by copyright holder

As mentioned on Bloomberg recently, the U.S. Department of Justice is pursuing a lawsuit against AT&T for collecting approximately $16 million from the United States government through reimbursements for a service offered for the deaf, but primarily being used by Internet scammers. For the last ten years, telecommunication companies have been required to provide an Internet-calling service that allows hearing impaired users to type messages through a computer and the message is relayed to the party on the other end of the phone line through an employee hired by the service provider. For calls that originate in the United States and that are made by hearing impaired users, the federal government reimburses a company like AT&T at a rate of $1.30 per minute.

The Justice Department is claiming that AT&T allowed the service to become overrun by scam artists operating outside the United States. They allegedly used the service to place anonymous calls when attempting to defraud U.S. companies with stolen credit cards or counterfeit money orders.

In addition, the government claims that AT&T has been collecting the $1.30 per minute rate on these overseas calls from the scammers. The Justice Department estimates that up to 95 percent of the calls didn’t fit the criteria of originating in the United States or being from an actual hearing impaired person.

In order to reduce the number of scammers using the service fraudulently, the FCC created a new requirement during 2008 that forced telecoms to collect names and mailing addresses of hearing impaired users to verify registration with the service. According to the account from the Justice Department, AT&T attempted to obtain verification through postcards sent to existing registered users, but was only able to verify 20 percent of the entire registered user base by September 2009.

Faced with the possibility that revenue collected from the federal government would drop drastically, AT&T management looked for another way to verify users under the guidelines provided by the FCC. According to the Justice Department, AT&T senior technical director Burt Bossi stated “We are expecting a serious decline in traffic because fraud will go to zero (at least temporarily) and we haven’t registered nearly enough customers to pick up the slack,” to other managers within the company at the time.

ATT-IP-RelayDuring October 2009, AT&T adopted a new computerized verification system called DASH that verified the user’s address only by checking to see if the address exists. For instance, a scammer operating out of Nigeria could hypothetically register any mailing address in the United States and AT&T would consider that user a verified, hearing impaired person. Subsequently, registrations spiked after the changes took place and the Justice Department claims that AT&T was aware of the sharp increase in scammers using the service. 

While AT&T could have logged the originating IP address of any user registering with the service to at least eliminate a portion of the scammers by country location, the company argues that “AT&T has followed the FCC’s rules for providing IP Relay services for disabled customers and for seeking reimbursement for those services,” in a statement issued to Ars Technica. A company representative went on to state “As the FCC is aware, it is always possible for an individual to misuse IP Relay services, just as someone can misuse the postal system or an email account, but FCC rules require that we complete all calls by customers who identify themselves as disabled.” 

The Justice Department is seeking triple damages from AT&T in regards to the collection of the $1.30 per minute fee for the fraudulent calls, basically returning the original $16 million to the American taxpayer plus an additional $32 million as punishment for exploiting the system meant to assist the hearing impaired. U.S. Attorney David J. Hickton stated “Taxpayers must not bear the cost of abuses of the Telecommunications Relay system. Those who misuse funds intended to benefit the hearing- and speech-impaired must be held accountable.”

Topics
Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
AT&T just made it a lot easier to upgrade your phone
AT&T Storefront with logo.

Do you want to upgrade your phone more than once a year? What about three times a year? Are you on AT&T? If you answered yes to those questions, then AT&T’s new “Next Up Anytime” early upgrade program is made for you. With this add-on, you’ll be able to upgrade your phone three times a year for just $10 extra every month. It will be available starting July 16.

Currently, AT&T has its “Next Up” add-on, which has been available for the past several years. This program costs $6 extra per month and lets you upgrade by trading in your existing phone after at least half of it is paid off. But the new Next Up Anytime option gives you some more flexibility.

Read more
Motorola is selling unlocked smartphones for just $150 today
Someone holding the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024).

Have you been looking for phone deals but don’t want to spend a ton of money on flagship devices from Apple and Samsung? Have you ever considered investing in an unlocked Motorola? For a limited time, the company is offering a $100 markdown on the Motorola Moto G 5G. It can be yours for just $150, and your days and nights of phone-shopping will finally be over!

Why you should buy the Motorola Moto G 5G
Powered by the Snapdragon 480+ 5G CPU and 4GB of RAM, the Moto G delivers exceptional performance across the board. From UI navigation to apps, games, and camera functions, you can expect fast load times, next to no buffering, and smooth animations. You’ll also get up to 128GB of internal storage that you’ll be able to use for photos, videos, music, and any other mobile content you can store locally. 

Read more
The Nokia 3210 is the worst phone I’ve used in 2024
A person holding the Nokia 3210, showing the screen.

Where do I even start with the Nokia 3210? Not the original, which was one of the coolest phones to own back in a time when Star Wars: Episode 1 -- The Phantom Menace wasn’t even a thing, but the latest 2024 reissue that has come along to save us all from digital overload, the horror of social media, and the endless distraction that is the modern smartphone.

Except behind this facade of marketing-friendly do-goodery hides a weapon of torture, a device so foul that I’d rather sit through multiple showings of Jar Jar Binks and the gang hopelessly trying to bring back the magic of A New Hope than use it.
The Nokia 3210 really is that bad

Read more