Skip to main content

The iPhone 7 may be a downgrade from the iPhone SE in terms of battery life

iphone 7 watch series 2 preorder guide version 1473928494 iphone7plus lineup
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Apple’s Senior Vice President Phil Schiller may have called the iPhone 7 Plus’s battery the “best yet” during the handset’s splashy San Francisco debut on Wednesday, but the same doesn’t appear to be true for its less generously endowed counterpart, the iPhone 7. According to Apple’s own estimates, the iPhone 7’s battery performs worse in a number of tasks than the smaller, cheaper iPhone SE.

An eagle-eyed reporter at AppleInsider first spotted the incongruity on Apple’s official website. On Apple’s iPhone SE product webpage, the handset is estimated at a full day, or 12 hours, of charge on 3G and 13 hours on LTE or Wi-Fi. Its talk time, meanwhile, is pegged at 14 hours, and video and audio playback are quoted at a respective 13 hours and 50 hours.

Recommended Videos

That’s in contrast to the iPhone 7’s numbers. Apple’s website lists the brand-new handset as lasting 12 hours on 3G — the same as the iPhone SE — but 12 hours on 4G LTE, or an hour short of the SE’s maximum. Audio playback is dramatically shorter, too, at 40 hours of wireless playback — 10 hours short of the iPhone SE’s quoted 50 hours of wired play. But Wi-Fi usage and talk time are estimated to be the same as the iPhone SE at 14 hours.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The iPhone 7 Plus’s battery, as you might expect, far outperforms the iPhone 7 and SE. According to Apple’s website, the larger of the Cupertino, California-based company’s smartphones lasts 13 hours on 3G and LTE and 15 hours on Wi-Fi. It’s good for up to 21 hours of talk time, and can play a continuous stream of audio for up to 60 hours.

The closeness in battery life between the iPhone 7 and iPhone SE is likely thanks to the handsets’ comparable cell sizes. The SE packs a 1,624mAh battery, and while Apple hasn’t disclosed the iPhone 7’s battery size, its closest analog, the iPhone 6S, sports a 1,715 pack.

Considering the amount of energy-saving tech the iPhone 7 contains, its weak battery showing comes as a bit of a surprise. Apple touted the new smartphone’s silicon as “high efficiency”: its A10 Fusion processor contains two energy-saving cores that power up when an intelligent controller favors efficiency over processing power. (Apple said they’ll kick in during light tasks like email composition and social media updates.)

And this would appear to put to bed a rumor, circulated in July, that the iPhone 7 would sport a significantly larger battery than the iPhone 6s — as high as 1,960mAh, or 14 percent larger than its predecessor’s 1,715mAh cell.

Battery life is not a new source of consternation among iPhone users, exactly. Third-party battery add-ons by Mophie routinely top iPhone accessory sales charts, and last year, Apple addressed the longstanding elephant in the room with a battery case of its own: the 1,877mAh Smart Battery Case.

And on the software side, the iPhone maker has regularly rolled out what might be perceived as “battery band-aids.” Newer iterations of iOS, the iPhone’s operating system, pack a Low Power Mode that reduces mail fetch, Siri functions, background app refresh, automatic downloads, and some visual effects to save on juice. And iOS 10 is reported to improve day-to-day software efficiency.

Apple said iPhone 6S users, on average, should expect to get up to 2 more hours of battery life out of the iPhone 7.

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
5 phones you should buy instead of the iPhone 16
Someone holding the iPhone 16.

Apple’s iPhone 16 has arrived, and it’s quite an impressive offering this year. Not only does it come in some of the best colors we’ve seen in a while, but it closes the gap between the base and Pro models even more.

That's all to say the iPhone 16 is a fantastic phone, but if you’re thinking about buying it as your next smartphone purchase, you should also consider some of these alternatives.
iPhone 16 Plus

Read more
5 phones you should buy instead of the Google Pixel 9 Pro
Pixel 9 Pro in Rose Quartz.

It’s been quite an exciting year for smartphones, especially with the arrival of the Google Pixel 9 series. Google gave its flagship phone a refreshing new design, more power and performance, and fun new colors.

If you’re considering the Pixel 9 Pro this year, that’s a great choice! We love the Pixel 9 Pro. But there are also other options to consider at a similar price point or even less. Before you buy the Pixel 9 Pro, here are five other phones you may want to get instead.
Google Pixel 9

Read more
I did an iPhone 16 Pro and Pixel 9 Pro camera test. It’s not even close
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max in Desert Titanium (left) and a Rose Quartz Google Pixel 9 Pro.

We’re at the tail end of the year, which means that pretty much all the flagship smartphones have now been released. This includes Google’s Pixel 9 Pro and Apple’s iPhone 16 Pro.

Both of these Pro flagships have beautiful designs, powerful processors, and great triple-lens camera systems. But which one takes better photos? Let’s find out.
iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro: camera specs

Read more