Skip to main content

China orders Samsung to ditch the bloatware from its devices

samsung lets users remove mobile bloatware but only in china galaxy s6 active hero
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There aren’t many smartphone users who are fans of bloatware: The manufacturer-made, own-brand apps that take up storage space and memory without necessarily offering any useful features or functions. Now Samsung has been ordered to give users the option of stripping bloatware off its phones — but only in China.

The move is a result of a lawsuit filed by a consumer rights committee in China, a suit that covered some 20 apps preinstalled on the Galaxy Note 3 (released in September 2013). Samsung lost the legal argument and so next month will release a patch for the Note 3 that lets users dismiss all these apps with a few taps — the company is also likely to tread more carefully when it comes to installing its own apps in the future.

It’s a more difficult issue than it might appear at first: After all, Apple installs plenty of its own apps on the iPhone, and there’s no option to remove them if you want to use iOS (though you can ignore them easily enough). The stock version of Android also has Google apps that can’t be uninstalled from the operating system, but apps from OEMs like Samsung and LG are somehow considered less desirable.

As The Korea Times reports, the Chinese version of the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 came with 44 preinstalled applications, and 24 of those were required in order to use the phablet. Consumers argued that there weren’t told about these apps in advance and weren’t able to find instructions to remove them. These unwanted apps use up data and cellular bandwidth as well as storage space, the lawsuit argued.

The rest of the world will have to put up with these preloaded apps for the time being — until someone files a lawsuit, at least. The expected launch of the Note 5 and the S6 Edge Plus in August will be another chance to see how much Samsung has taken the ruling to heart.

Editors' Recommendations

David Nield
Dave is a freelance journalist from Manchester in the north-west of England. He's been writing about technology since the…
Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 or wait for the Z Fold 6?
The Galaxy Z Fold 4 (left) and Galaxy Z Fold 5 rear panels.

The Galaxy Z Fold 4 (left) and Galaxy Z Fold 5 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

If you’re in the market for a foldable phone, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 is one of the best you can get. Hands down. This is especially true considering that Samsung has five years of experience in the foldable market.

Read more
Samsung’s next folding phone could be cheaper than we thought
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5, Galaxy Z Fold 4, and Galaxy Z Flip 5 resting on a table.

the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (from left) Galaxy Z Fold 5, and Galaxy Z Flip 5 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It increasingly seems likely that Samsung’s foldable phone strategy is aiming for a lower price bracket. Right now, a taste of Galaxy foldables will cost you a minimum of $1,000. However, an upcoming entry-level foldable phone might bring that barrier down to just $800.

Read more
Samsung may have a big surprise in store with its next folding phone
A person holding the open Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5, showing the screen.

As Mobile World Congress (MWC) 2024 continues in Barcelona, Spain, there are whispers that Samsung could be releasing not one, but two Galaxy Z Fold 6 models. More specifically, one of them could be a Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra, at least according to a report from WinFuture. If this is the case, it will be the first time that Samsung releases two Z Fold variants at the same time — and the first time we've seen an Ultra model in the Z Fold family.

For some time now, there has been a rumor that Samsung was possibly launching a second “fold” in the Galaxy Z series, which currently includes the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5. However, most of the rumors up until this point have suggested that a second “Fold” model would have been a cheaper, more affordable variant. However, that may not be the case.

Read more