Skip to main content

The worst movie sequels of all time

Why ruin a good thing? These are some of the worst movie sequels ever made

When a movie is both a box-office and critical success, it usually means we’ll get a sequel. Sometimes, the sequels measure up to the original films, and in rare cases, they’re even better than the movies that preceded them. Far too often, though, a sequel falls flat, and serves as a reminder that some things are better left without a second (or third, fourth, or fifth) chapter.

Here are some of the worst movie sequels to have found their way to the big screen.

‘The Next Karate Kid’ (1994)

The Next Karate Kid
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This infamously failed reboot brought back Pat Morita in the role of Mr. Miyagi, but a new star replaced franchise veteran Ralph Macchio: Future two-time Oscar winner Hilary Swank. Her character became Miyagi’s latest martial arts student, whom he attempted to help through anger issues following the death of her parents. The film was widely panned by critics, though one good thing did come out of it: Swank got on Hollywood’s radar and went on to become a huge star.

‘Speed 2: Cruise Control’ (1997)

Speed 2: Cruise Control
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The original Speed was a big hit, helping to propel the careers of both Keanu Reeves and Sandra Bullock, but Reeves turned down the sequel. The studio turned to Jason Patric to co-star with Bullock, moving from the infamous speeding bus that can’t stop to a slow-moving cruise ship on a collision course with an oil tanker. The thrill of the fast-moving chase was gone, and Bullock was widely criticized for her seemingly lackluster performance. The film was so bad, it received a Golden Raspberry Award (aka Razzie) in the “Worst Remake or Sequel” category that year.

‘Staying Alive’ (1983)

Staying Alive
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Disco drama Saturday Night Fever cemented John Travolta’s reputation as both dancer and when it premiered in 1977, but when Sylvester Stallone attempted to co-write and direct this sequel, it just didn’t make viewers want to throw on their dancing shoes. While the film did earn a decent $65 million at the box office, it didn’t do well with critics. While it’s hard to judge films on Rotten Tomatoes so long after the fact, the film has earned a 0 percent score on the site, with the critical consensus calling it “shockingly embarrassing and unnecessary, trading the original’s dramatic depth for a series of uninspired dance sequences.”

‘The Fly II’ (1989)

The Fly II
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Director David Cronenberg’s masterful 1986 science-fiction/horror remake was tainted by its lackluster 1989 follow-up, which starred Eric Stoltz as Martin Brundle, the son of Jeff Goldblum’s character from the original, who also became genetically merged with a fly. The sequel — directed by special effects wizard Chris Walas — didn’t come close to living up to the original, with The New York Times saying that it “degenerates into a series of slime-riddled, glop-oozing, special effects in its final half hour.”

‘Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps’ (2010)

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Even if you haven’t seen 1987’s Wall Street, there’s a good chance you’re at least familiar with the film and Michael Douglas’ iconic greed monologue in it. The good news about this sequel is that Douglas reprises his role as ruthless corporate raider Gordon Gekko. Unfortunately, the decision to transition Gekko from greedy, money-hungry villain to reformed bad guy — a decision made in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis — plus the addition Shia LaBeouf as Gekko’s soon-to-be son-in-law just wasn’t what audiences wanted. It wasn’t a box-office bomb and it got mixed reviews from critics, but it simply didn’t have the same delicious fervor of the original.

‘Exorcist II: The Heretic’ (1977)

Exorcist II: The Heretic
Warner Bros. / Warner Bros.

Many consider this 1977 film to be one of the worst movies ever made, not just one of the worst sequels. After watching possessed girl Regan (Linda Blair) rotate her head 360 degrees and contort her body to crawl down a set of stairs, audiences were fast-forwarded into the life of a now 16-year-old Regan. While seemingly in recovery from demonic possession, Regan is put under scientific testing and hypnotized in an effort to find out more about what happened to both her and Father Merrin (Max von Sydow) that fateful night. Neither William Friedkin, director of the original, nor William Peter Blatty, who wrote and produced the first film (and the book on which it was based), had anything to do with this sequel, and it showed.

‘The Chronicles of Riddick’ (2004)

The Chronicles of Riddick
Image used with permission by copyright holder

A bona fide box-office bomb, this sci-fi adventure film was a follow-up to 2000’s indie hit Pitch Black, and starred Vin Diesel as the title character, a dangerous criminal on the run from bounty hunters and mercenaries. The film had a massive production budget — reportedly somewhere in the nine-figure range — yet only grossed $57 million domestically. Interestingly, the film did develop somewhat of a cult following after its DVD release, but it was still a disappointing follow up to the original, which developed a passionate fan base on the home entertainment market.

‘Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd’ (2003)

Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sure, 1994’s Dumb and Dumber was a cheesy comedy in and of itself, but Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels’ portrayal of naive friends Lloyd and Harry, respectively, made it a comedy classic. The movie (and characters) developed a cult following and launched the careers of its directors, the Farrelly brothers. The film was so popular that in 2014, 20 years later, a sequel launched with the two stars reprising their roles. However, years before that sequel, there was a famously bad attempt to capitalize on the success of the characters with a prequel that starred Derek Richardson and Eric Christian Olsen in the roles of Harry and Lloyd. It performed moderately well at the box office, but we’re not really sure why.

‘Grease 2’ (1982)

Grease 2
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Grease (1978) is one of those iconic films, forever ingrained in our memories. We’d rather forget about its sequel, though, which was based on the original musical romantic comedy but didn’t feature either Olivia Newton-John or John Travolta. Taking place two years after the first film and set in 1961, Grease 2 couldn’t even benefit from a memorable performance by Michelle Pfeiffer. True, the movie helped put Pfeiffer on the map, but it simply didn’t have the same on-screen magic of its predecessor. It was so badly received that plans for an additional two films were scrapped. Fun fact: The script for what was to be the third movie ended up being used to create High School Musical in 2006.

‘Caddyshack II’ (1988)

Caddyshack II
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sometimes it’s best to leave a successful film alone — especially a beloved classic. This is what should have happened with Caddyshack, a star-studded 1980 film directed by the late Harold Ramis that featured Chevy Chase, Rodney Dangerfield, and Bill Murray in the prime of their comedy careers, as well as a host of other, high-profile cast members. Instead, a PG-rated sequel was released as a follow-up to the R-rated original, which chronicled the crazy hijinks of a group of people working, playing, and (in at least one case) living at a posh country club. Only Chase reprised his role, joined by a new cast of comedic talents including Dan Aykroyd, Randy Quaid, and Jessica Lundy. “Handicapped by a family-friendly PG rating,” reads the Rotten Tomatoes critic consensus, “even the talents of Caddyshack II’s all-star comic cast can’t save it from its lazy, laughless script and uninspired direction.”

‘Blues Brothers 2000’ (1998)

Blues Brothers 2000
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The 1980 original musical comedy, developed from characters in a recurring Saturday Night Live sketch and featuring a host of legends from the R&B music world, should have been left alone to bask in its successful glory. Unfortunately, a sequel was launched almost 20 years later starring Dan Aykroyd and John Goodman. Ostensibly, it was created to honor some of the deceased cast members from the first film — particularly, John Belushi, John Candy, and Cab Calloway. The film received mixed reviews and was widely regarded as an overcrowded, cameo-heavy mess. It was nowhere near as successful and well-received as the original, which remains the second highest-grossing film borne from an SNL sketch, behind the original Wayne’s World movie.

‘Jaws 3-D’ (1983)

Jaws 3-D
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This film was so notoriously bad that it remains the stuff of bad-movie legend more than three decades later. It was the second sequel to the iconic horror-thriller Jaws, and the third installment of the franchise. They should have stopped at two. Now working in a Florida marine park, the Brody children face terror from a great white shark (or two) that infiltrates the park from the sea, attacking employees. Made in 3D (yes, in the ’80s, so you can imagine how life-like it ended up being), that cool factor gave the film a boost in theaters. It came nowhere close to the original, though, with words like “campy,” “cheesy,” and “awful” occurring in abundance in reviews, along with plenty of criticism of 3D effects that were more gimmicky than compelling.

Christine Persaud
Christine has decades of experience in trade and consumer journalism. While she started her career writing exclusively about…
5 things we need to see in The Mandalorian & Grogu Star Wars movie
The Mandalorian and Grogu in a poster for the Disney+ series.

It's not hard to see why Lucasfilm gave the green light to the upcoming Mandalorian & Grogu movie. No new characters from the new Disney era are as widely beloved as they are. In a time when so many Star Wars films have been announced and subsequently abandoned, a movie based on The Mandalorian feels like a surefire hit.

And yet, everything else about this film remains a mystery. What's the story? When does it even take place? None of that is known. But I think we can agree that the following five things need to be addressed in the upcoming film.
1. The right epic feel and scope

Read more
Netflix is streaming the craziest action movie of 2024. Here’s why I loved it
A man floating in air kicks another man in the face in City Hunter.

This month seems to be the time to release action movies that color outside the lines. We've already had Dev Patel's Monkey Man, a messy, throw-everything-at-the-wall action movie that blends intricate fight sequences and on-the-nose social commentary in an entertaining package that will surely gain cult status in the near future. Just this weekend, Boy Kills World dished out loads of cartoon violence and over-the-top gore in a bid for John Wick-level fandom. Both movies bend or break the rules of reality to deliver quickly cut fight scenes that push the boundaries of the genre, all in an attempt to one-up the high standards set by the best movies in the Mission: Impossible and Fast and Furious franchises.

Yet the best of the April bunch is the one that has the lowest profile. City Hunter doesn't star anyone you'd recognize like It actor Bill Skarsgård in Boy Kills World and hasn't been backed by an extensive marketing campaign like Universal's Monkey Man. But the movie is a blast; it's like putting Pop Rocks in a can of Mountain Dew and chasing it down with a couple of Pixy Sticks. It's ludicrous, immature, and totally unrealistic. It's also my favorite action movie of 2024. Here's why you need to stream City Hunter pronto.
It's an adaptation of a massively popular franchise

Read more
Does the sci-fi classic Alien have the best movie marketing campaign ever?
An alien egg cracks open with the tagline "In space no one can hear you scream" underneath in the Alien movie poster.

There’s a case to be made that the Xenomorph is the greatest movie monster ever conceived. It’s certainly among the most iconic. H.R. Giger, the Swiss artist who designed the title creature of Alien, took inspiration from Francis Bacon and Rolls-Royce, and emerged with a biomechanical killing machine that's instantly identifiable in silhouette. Cross a tapeworm with a shark, a cockroach, a dinosaur, and a motorcycle, and you’re close to describing the nightmare Giger and director Ridley Scott inflicted on unsuspecting moviegoers in 1979.

A monster so unforgettable sells itself. One look is all it would take to know that you had to see the cursed thing in action. And yet, there’s barely a glimpse of the alien in any of the original advertising for Alien. The beast is completely absent from the posters, and the trailer contains only a borderline-subliminal flash of its earliest larval stage, the face hugger. Unless you subscribed to a select few science fiction fan magazines — the ones boasting some enticing behind-the-scenes images, all part of a final “hard push” to get asses in seats — you were going into Alien blind, completely unprepared for the exact nature of the threat faced by its cast of unlucky galaxy-traversing characters.

Read more