Skip to main content

Microsoft Wireless Desktop 3000 Review

Microsoft Wireless Desktop 3000
“Microsoft had to cut corners somewhere to hit this attractive price point...”
Pros
  • Programmable hotkeys
  • loaded with features
  • mouse works on almost any surface
  • inexpensive
Cons
  • Mouse buttons require too much fingertip pressure
  • glossy black plastic shows smudges and scratches easily
  • doesn't come with rechargeable batteries
  • Long-term durability

Summary

So you need a new mouse and keyboard, but the economy being what it is, you don’t have a lot of green to spare. If you’re willing to accept some compromises, Microsoft has a very good combo package including both with more features than you might expect for $80—and the mouse and keyboard are wireless, to boot.

Microsoft Wireless Desktop 3000 Performance

Compromises made here aren’t ill-advised, but we’ll discuss them first because there’s no point in considering the Wireless Desktop 3000 if you find them to be deal-breakers. Our first observation might seem like a trivial complaint, but the labels on the keys appear to be appliqués, which makes us wonder about their long-term durability. They’re not so poorly done that you’d need to worry about peeling—we scraped across them with several sharp-edged objects without damaging them—but will they stand up to years of daily wear?

Furthermore, while the mouse and keyboard use the 2.4GHz frequency band to communicate with your PC, they’re not Bluetooth, so they don’t establish a Personal Area Network (PAN) that you can connect to other devices. Being wireless, they rely on battery power as well, but if you want to use rechargeable batteries—two AAs each—you’ll have to provide your own. There’s no power switch on the keyboard either, so the only way to turn it off is to remove its batteries. The mouse has one, but the only way to activate is to plug the wireless transceiver dongle into it (presumably so you can stash it in your travel bag without worrying about draining the battery).

LEDs have to be some of the least expensive components used to build computer peripherals—they even show up in cooling fans—so we were surprised to discover that the only one on the keyboard is a low-battery indicator. On most keyboards, LEDs glow when caps-lock or num-lock are engaged. A brief message flashes on your display when you press these keys, but that’s it.

Microsoft Wireless Desktop 3000 Features and Design

Still interested? Okay, let’s move on to design considerations. First and foremost, the keyboard is a straight as an arrow—the only curves you’ll find are at the corners and the only ergonomic feature is a rubberized wrist rest. The mouse is ambidextrous and its button functions can be easily remapped in software to accommodate southpaws. Our thumb and ring finger naturally grasped the recessed grips on the left and right sides, which are covered with a textured, rubberized material. Buttons immediately above these grips are assigned by default to moving backwards and forwards through your web-browsing history.

The ubiquitous mouse wheel is coated with the same rubberized material as the keyboard, but it’s not indexed and therefore doesn’t provide any tactile feedback when you roll it. It offers a third button (with its default action being to launch Flip 3D, a utility that organizes every open window in a mosaic of tiles) and it can be tilted left and right for horizontal scrolling.

The top of the mouse is curved to follow the shape of your hand, but the left and right buttons are somewhat stiff, an issue that’s compounded by their slope, which robs your fingers of much of their leverage when you push down to click the buttons. Microsoft’s BlueTrack technology lives up to its claim of working on virtually any surface—we tried it on varnished plywood, a magazine cover, a granite countertop, and even pile carpeting—but you definitely would not want to play twitch games with this mouse because its top buttons require too much fingertip pressure.

The keyboard feels much better under our fingers, providing very good tactile feedback with appropriate resistance and the sense that there’s an end to the keys’ travel. Having said that, we don’t like its feel nearly as much as we do that of the Das Keyboard DASK3, which boasts an honest-to-goodness mechanical switch beneath each key. Cheaper keyboards (including this one, we’re willing to bet) use membrane switches and that’s why they feel mushy by comparison. On the other hand, we know plenty of people who can’t abide the loud clicks the Das Keyboard’s switches make.

Microsoft Wireless Desktop 3000 The Wireless Keyboard 3000 is positively festooned with programmable buttons, but they don’t get in your way unless you make regular use of the function keys, which some of them share space with (there’s an F-lock button for toggling back and forth). There are hot keys for undo and redo, for opening a new document, for opening and closing your My Documents folder, for replying to and forwarding emails, for printing a document, and for launching the calculator—there’s even a button for spell checking.

Buttons in a row above the F keys will launch (or bring its window to the front if it’s already open) your email client, web browser, instant messaging client, or media player. These buttons are programmable too, so the applications they launch don’t have to come from Microsoft. We expected the media player button to launch Windows Media Player, for instance, but we were pleasantly surprised to see J. River’s Media Jukebox—the program we’ve been using to play FLAC and MP3 files from our home server—pop up instead.

Conclusion

Microsoft ill-advisedly fell in with the trend of using glossy black plastic for large areas of the mouse and keyboard surfaces. The material looked sophisticated and pretty for about five minutes before the oil from our fingertips left unsightly smears and smudges. What’s worse is that when we tried scrubbing them with a microfiber cloth—the same material we use to clean our eyeglasses—we scratched the keyboard’s surface.

The compromises we discussed at the beginning of this review are to be expected—Microsoft had to cut corners somewhere to hit this attractive price point—but let’s be realistic. The glossy plastic, the mouse’s severe curve, and the absence of power switches are mistakes that hold us back from giving the Wireless Desktop 3000 a higher rating.

Pros:

  • Wireless
  • Lots of programmable hot keys 
  • Mouse works on nearly any surface 
  • Keyboard provides good tactile feedback

Cons:

  • Front of mouse slopes severely
  • Glossy black plastic too easily scratched 
  • Can’t recharge batteries 
  • Long-term durability

Editors' Recommendations

Michael Brown
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Intel’s next-gen desktop chips may embrace these two major changes
Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.

Intel Arrow Lake is said to be coming out later this year, but the leaks have been scarce -- until today. According to Benchlife, Intel is readying 13 new processors, but forget any mentions of a 15th-gen CPU -- these chips all follow Intel's new branding and will be dubbed the Intel Core Ultra 200 series. That’s the first big change. What else is new, other than the name? If Benchlife is correct, the loss of hyperthreading will be the other notable difference.

Arrow Lake CPUs will be the first desktop generation to follow Intel's new naming scheme, and thus, the first under the new Core Ultra umbrella. Meteor Lake paved the way, but those are laptop chips, whereas Arrow Lake processors are coming to desktops. This includes the Core Ultra 200 K-series, which encompasses the unlocked versions of CPUs that have a processor base power (PBP) of 125 watts, as well as the locked Core Ultra 200 non-K variant that maxes out at 65 watts.

Read more
Apple finally has a way to defeat ChatGPT
A MacBook and iPhone in shadow on a surface.

OpenAI needs to watch out because Apple may finally be jumping on the AI bandwagon, and the news doesn't bode well for ChatGPT. Apple is reportedly working on a large language model (LLM) referred to as ReALM, which stands for Reference Resolution As Language Modeling. Made to give Siri a boost and help it understand context, the model comes in four variants, and Apple claims that even its smallest model performs on a similar level to OpenAI's ChatGPT.

This tantalizing bit of information comes from an Apple research paper, first shared by Windows Central, and it appears to be an early peek into what Apple has been cooking for a while now. ReALM is Apple's own LLM that was reportedly made to enhance Siri's capabilities; these improvements include a greater ability to understand context in a conversation.

Read more
How much does an AI supercomputer cost? Try $100 billion
A Microsoft datacenter.

It looks like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Sora, among other projects, are about to get a lot more juice. According to a new report shared by The Information, Microsoft and OpenAI are working on a new data center project, one part of which will be a massive AI supercomputer dubbed "Stargate." Microsoft is said to be footing the bill, and the cost is astronomical as the name of the supercomputer suggests -- the whole project might cost over $100 billion.

Spending over $100 billion on anything is mind-blowing, but when put into perspective, the price truly shows just how big a venture this might be: The Information claims that the new Microsoft and OpenAI joint project might cost a whopping 100 times more than some of the largest data centers currently in operation.

Read more