Skip to main content

Was the Tinder meltdown over Vanity Fair’s article a planned publicity stunt?

tinda finger
Image used with permission by copyright holder
It was the article that launched a thousand tweets, the piece heard around the Twitterverse, the post that … well, you get the point.

A Vanity Fair article, titled “Tinder and the Dawn of the ‘Dating Apocalypse,” has drawn the extremely public – and some say, juvenile – wrath of the dating app, prompting a very prolific series of tweets on Tuesday evening that targeted journalist Nancy Jo Sales for what the Tinder team called an “incredibly biased view.” In 31 tweets, Tinder managed to point out the size of its user base (8 billion connections have been made to date, apparently), highlight the app’s alignment with marriage equality, and emphasize its global reach (hi, China and North Korea). And if this all seems a little too preplanned to be a spontaneous, organic display of frustration with “one-sided journalism,” that may be because it was.

According to a tweet from BuzzFeed reporter Claudia Koerner, the entire maelstrom appeared to be a premeditated effort engineered by a PR team. As AdWeek reported, Koerner claims that PR firm Rogers & Cowan allegedly said “they worked with Tinder and to keep an eye on the brand [sic] Twitter account — they’d be firing back at the Vanity Fair article.” While Tinder has not yet addressed these claims, they’re still standing by their angry tirade, which has been described as “bizarre,” “defensive,” and “like a letter from a scorned lover.”

In a statement to Wired, the dating app admitted that it overreacted, but maintained its legitimacy, saying, “We have a passionate team that truly believes in Tinder. While reading a recent Vanity Fair article about today’s dating culture, we were saddened to see that the article didn’t touch upon the positive experiences that the majority of our users encounter daily. Our intention was to highlight the many statistics and amazing stories that are sometimes left unpublished, and, in doing so, we overreacted.”

Of course, manufactured or not, Tinder’s blow-up was still pretty hilarious. Even more hilarious, perhaps, than some of the worst Tinder pickup lines I’ve received.

So tweet on, Tinder. And keep making connections.

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more