Skip to main content

UK lawsuit could compel Facebook to reveal true identities of cyber-bullies, may have further online privacy implications

troll face.It all began with what seemed like an innocent post on the Facebook profile of a contestant in the UK talent show The X Factor, but it prompted an unpleasant round of weapons-grade trolling, resulting in a lawsuit to not only reveal the identities of the faceless bullies, but a campaign to amend legislation regarding online anonymity too.

In November last year, Louise Brookes wrote “keep your chin up, Frankie, they’ll move onto someone else soon” on X Factor contestant Frankie Cocozza’s Facebook page, in response to “abusive” comments being posted there.

This resulted in the trolls turning their attention to Brookes, and the insults instantly started to fly in her direction. It’s here that one of the key rules of the Internet was broken (number 14, actually), as she actively engaged the bullies, but soon discovered “trying to answer the trolls back didn’t work though I did try.”

Things quickly escalated, with Brookes saying “they started getting very personal, looking at my Facebook account, and talking about my appearance and my age.” A fake Facebook profile was setup using Brookes’ photo, and explicit messages were sent to the accounts of young girls in her name.

It’s also mentioned that Brookes’ home address was revealed, but no information on her Facebook account’s privacy settings have been stated.

She describes feeling “helpless” and says the “reaction and public comments directed towards me will stay with me for the rest of my life.”

Lawsuit

The fake Facebook profile was subsequently removed, but Brookes’ appeals to local police on the matter were less successful, with a spokesperson telling The Telegraph that they “have looked at the material sent to us and made every effort to trace the person responsible … but this is notoriously difficult to prove.”

Law firm Bains Cohen has been enlisted to compel Facebook to provide the IP addresses of those making the offending posts, in an effort to unmask the bullies and allow Brookes to file a private lawsuit against them.

If successful, it would be the first of its type in the UK, and comes soon after the prosecution of a student for a racial attack on an MP via Twitter. Bains Cohen are using this to their advantage, saying the police take a more active approach to online harassment when it involves a well-known person.

To raise funds to cover court fees, PR firm Byfield Consultancy have also got involved, and — somewhat ironically given the source of the problems — a Facebook page called Trolls and Me, which highlights problematic legislation preventing police from investigating online harassment, has also been setup.

The Frankie factor

Brookes’ problems arose from a post made on 18-year old Frankie Cocozza’s Facebook page, an individual who has attracted considerable controversy since his appearance on the talent contest.

He also attracts a rabid fan following, primarily amongst teenage girls, and there’s no doubt 45-year old Brookes showing up on his Facebook page — regardless of her supportive message — made her standout as an easy target.

Trial implications

On the surface, this is all about bullying, but as her legal battle is hampered not only by costs, but also by the police being unable to discover the bullies identity, it’s also about online anonymity.

It’s surprising, but possibly only a matter of time, before the cause is linked to efforts to introduce extensive Internet monitoring systems in the UK, which will provide law enforcement with access to online activities through ISPs.

Although it’s Facebook who will have to supply the IP addresses and any other pertinent information here, Brookes’ success or failure in her efforts will set a precedent which could apply all over the Internet.

If her own lawsuit is successful, it could make some online bullies think twice in the future, however her efforts to give law enforcement more power when it comes to identifying people on the Internet, could be used to advance worrying laws determined to erode our online privacy.

Topics
Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more