Skip to main content

Go big or go home: Why social networks are supersizing their photos

why social networks are supersizing their photos twitter photo feature bill couch
Image used with permission by copyright holder

On Thursday, Twitter changed its embedded photo feature to allow users to post bigger pictures. The change is aesthetically pleasing, since it gives both landscape and portrait photos a more prominent position, allowing for more visual impact. 

This is how it looks, courtesy of everyone’s favorite Canadian astronaut:

Looks good, it’s easier to see the photo, and it puts more emphasis on the individual tweet — an all-around visual success. But this change isn’t only about aesthetics. It’s about shoring up confidence in potential investors. It’s about keeping up with Facebook. And it tells a story about how important social networks believe images are to their monetization efforts. 

Facebook has been on a campaign to make itself more like Twitter, introducing hashtags and verified checkmarks and attempting to convince people to use it as a real-time discussion forum. The efforts haven’t been very successful. But with these embedded photo posts, Twitter is trying to adopt something that Facebook already has going on — a focus on photos.

Facebook made some changes to the News Feed earlier this year, giving photos a more prominent place. Like Twitter, this decision just looks better, but there was another reason for the decision to privilege photos. Facebook was adding advertisements into its primary feed, and bigger photos appealed to the clients hoping to maximize their visual impact. And even more recently, Facebook increased ad sizes within News Feed, sweetening the pot further. 

Obviously, Facebook makes improvements in order to keep users excited about the service, so the larger photos were also for our benefit. But in this case, it had far more to gain from advertisers by drumming up the photo size, since it could pitch an enhanced advertising experience. Facebook users would’ve kept on using the old format without complaint (or with only minor ones).

ig photoFacebook owns Instagram, and it’s likely no happy accident that Instagram just switched to larger pictures, since it will also  introduce ads soon. Just as Facebook used larger images to attract advertisers, it’s making the same adjustments to Instagram. For iPhone users who updated to iOS 7, Instagram’s photos and videos now stretch edge-to-edge, providing a more immersive experience. It’s nice to look at … and the prominent placement will make it harder to ignore the ads that will soon pop up in the stream. It worked once, and it will likely work again. 

Twitter is pulling from Facebook’s playbook on this. As the micro-blogging site gears up for its IPO, it wants to do something to be more attractive to marketers. Facebook resuscitated its flailing mobile ad campaign partly by doing things like bolstering its photo ad appeal, and it worked so well that it’s taking the same approach with Instagram. And now Twitter wants to do the same thing. It might not be creative, but it’s smart. 

Twitter is more text-based than the other social networks, which is one of the reasons it’s the place to go to find out what others are thinking about events happening in real time. But the emphasis on text could be a detriment to the site’s monetization attempts, since advertisers want to introduce a compelling visual element to their campaigns. Witty tweets can help brands, but prominent image-based advertisements are more viscerally gripping. 

Twitter is already an appealing ad platform, which is one of the reasons it scores stuff like exclusive, extensive advertising campaigns with Gap. But it’s just not as big as Facebook, and it needs to compete with both Facebook and Instagram. To ensure a successful IPO, Twitter has to continue tweaking its format to best appeal to marketers and advertisers. And this change in photo policy, though it may look like a purely cosmetic decision, is actually a shrewd move to attract more business. 

Fortunately for us, it also means our own photos will grow too – just remember that when you see your photos getting better real estate on Twitter, that ads won’t be an exception.

Topics
Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more